Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else” as Want to Read:
Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else

3.66  ·  Rating details ·  2,711 ratings  ·  367 reviews
In the last few decades what it means to be rich has changed dramatically. Forget the 1%; it's the wealthiest .01% who are fast outpacing the rest of us. Today's colossal fortunes are amassed by the diligent toiling of smart, perceptive businessmen who see themselves as deserving victors in a cutthroat international competition.
Cracking open this tight-knit world is Chry
Hardcover, 352 pages
Published October 16th 2012 by Doubleday Canada (first published October 1st 2012)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Plutocrats, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Yannick Cornet Now that Chrystia Freeland became Canada's minister of Foreign Affairs and that Trump took power, this book is particularly timely to understand what …moreNow that Chrystia Freeland became Canada's minister of Foreign Affairs and that Trump took power, this book is particularly timely to understand what is at play - and what Trumpism is all about. Viewed from this angle, Trump's actions are not irrational, they fit right in the logic of super-rich cronyism for the purpose of self-enrichment. Therefore the book is a useful basis to start answering the question: how to deal with plutocrats (and the accompanying concentration of wealth to the 1%)?(less)

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 3.66  · 
Rating details
 ·  2,711 ratings  ·  367 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else
Nov 15, 2012 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: economics
I feel a little guilty about rating this even though I didn't finish it but it just didn't work for me, and that is why I stopped. I read the first two and a half chapters, about half of chapter 4 and then skimmed chapter 5 and read probably a third or more of chapter 6.

The author definitely knows her subjects well, including knowing many of the plutocrats by name. This is a positive because she doesn't have to speak in the abstract but, it also has its down sides. Many of the chapters just rea
There is a good book in here somewhere. The first 3 chapters were very frustrating. Almost an exercise in name-dropping and naming the names dropped and what they ate. Maybe an exaggeration but at times I thought I was reading a series of newspaper items. The last three chapters picked up somewhat as it got a bit more meaty but in the end I am not sure the awards nor the positive reviews were earned. So very very light weight.
Blaise Lucey
Mar 22, 2013 rated it liked it
First, readers need to understand one thing: the cover, the name, and the back of the book are a marketing gimmick. For the first hundred pages, at least, there is nothing insightful about plutocrats themselves. Indeed, for many pages, Freeland excitingly glorifies capitalism and its winners. She enjoys referencing herself on many occasions, and just how many people she has talked to who have money, the revelations given to her from people who are celebrities for wealth alone. No crime, of cours ...more
Stephie Jane Rexroth
Oct 12, 2012 rated it it was ok
This book would have benefited from a second author, a sociologist, political scientist or economist, to transform Chrystia Freeland's interviews into a cohesive thesis. The chapters and subheadings were arbitrary; the book read more like an anthology of short articles on the subject of super-elites.

I suppose it is natural for a journalist to want to let the findings of their investigation speak for themselves. But, the conclusions and suggested solutions are what I seek from new information: w
Nadine Dajani
Apr 17, 2013 rated it really liked it
This was not as readable as I had hoped - there is quite a but of historical background and unnecessary detail - but it's chock full of interesting tidbits nonetheless. I read this book while on a week-long beach resort vacation so it might not have been the best setting to be reading about economic history, but the fact that I managed to finish it speaks to its merit.
The author provides an interesting theory as to who the Plutocrats really are and why we the masses are less likely nowadays to d
Joshua S.
Oct 14, 2012 added it
Shelves: done-with-it
Reading this book made me anxious as a high-middle class, mid-level management wage slave and a father of two. You can find descriptions of what's in the book and analyses of contents elsewhere- I realize she's a journalist and, I suppose, is following her instincts and her training to be 'fair and balanced' in her approach but:

1) I would have liked to have been presented with some concrete actions I can take to slow down or reverse the seeming inexorable ascendance of the %.1 or at least ensure
Oct 20, 2012 rated it it was ok
Recommends it for: no one
Recommended to Margie by: Bill Moyers
My low rating for this book is based on two things: the misalignment between the author's outlook and mine, and the way the author organized the information.

If Freeland had expressed either a negative or positive opinion of the rise of a plutocracy, I would have respected her more. Instead she not only presents it as inevitable, but also seems a bit fawning toward the ultra rich. She doesn't go into a political analysis, which disappointed me. She goes along with their analysis without contribut
Todd Martin
Oct 21, 2012 rated it it was ok
Plutocrats might be described as intelligent, highly educated, self-made, go-getters who have worked hard, innovated and successfully built businesses that create jobs, and benefit the economy. Their products enrich society and create technologies that allow the citizens of third world nations to work their way out of poverty and fashion better lives for themselves and their families. These individuals are compensated well, but fairly, for their achievements. They then use their millions (or bil ...more

I have watched the interview Matt Taibbi and Chrystia Freeland gave to Bill Moyers. CF spoke about her book. Some notes I’ve taken, ahead:

(a) The topic of the inequality/super-rich (the top 0.01%) is still a taboo, as the debates between M. Romney and B. Obama showed; the think-tanks feel good about approaching “poverty” ,though. The former topic, in the words of CF is “very frightening”.

(b) CF spoke of several phenomena under way: a hammered middle class, the attack of the plutocrats on “
Oct 31, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: adult-nonfiction
I wanted to read this book after seeing the author on "Moyers & Company:

(If you go to the website, notice the "Dig Deeper" link on the left. Mr. Moyers is starting a book club, with this book as his first selection. There is a discussion and will be a chat with the author coming up soon.)

This is a topic which seems to be gathering interest. Charles Murray's book, "Coming Apart", Geoffrey Faux's "The Servant Economy", and other recent books have addressed t
David Stephens
Dec 24, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: economics
In Plutocrats, Chrystia Freeland examines "those at the very top: who they are, how they made their money, how they think, and how they relate to the rest of us." She makes a distinction between the richest 1% and the richest 0.1% because there is a large discrepancy between these two groups that is less frequently noticed than the one between the top 1% and bottom 99%. In fact, she suggests there are two separate economies: one for the rich—a "plutonomy"—and one for the rest of the country. And ...more
Dec 16, 2012 rated it it was ok
I found this book on plutocrats interesting but mostly composed of loosely related vignettes rather than an all-encompassing thesis rigorously defended by its author and what that I had hoped to find. Yes, the growth in technology and globalization have increased inequality. Yes, you point to the rise of the intellectual class and the importance of human capital. And yes, you describe the plutocrats and how they ascended. But I wanted the author to tie it all together in a coherent thesis that o ...more
Charles Haywood
Oct 30, 2018 rated it liked it
From the cover, I expected this book to be a lightweight documentary version of "Crazy Rich Asians," offering painfully amusing stories about the foibles of the super-rich, accompanied by cautions about the negative effects of such behavior upon the rest of America. Plus, the picture of private jets in the driveway attracted me as a vision of my hoped-for future, since I am comfortably in the 0.1%, and much of my time is spent struggling to reach yet higher. Instead, this book is a pretty dense, ...more
Oct 27, 2012 rated it really liked it
Henry Ford said that mass production required mass consumers. This was his way of saying that his success was dependent on the existence of a successful society. I think he also understood that gains made by adding value to society will lift the boats of everyone for the most part.

The problem comes in when those at the top "arrive." They almost certainly try to set up barriers for others in order to maintain their privileged positions (think Citizens United). This is when the whole system beco
Jul 15, 2013 rated it liked it
Recommended to Sera by: Book Page Magazine
3.5 stars

This book pretty much confirmed what I already thought:

*The game is rigged against those of us who don't fall into the 0.1% of the top 1% of wealthiest in global society, known as the "Plutocrats".

*The Plutocrats live in a bubble of self-entitlement that has extended to the point where this group of people feels that they can do better for society than any government.

*Much of the wealth that this group has earned comes from both illegal and legal corruption. They are not as "self-mad
David Mayes
Oct 15, 2012 rated it it was amazing
Very telling and very timely.
Nov 19, 2012 rated it really liked it
Today's world is going through two Gilded Ages simultaneously, the 2nd for the U.S. and the 1st for the BRICs. The income inequality in these nations has created a situation in which the top 1% have more in common with each other than with their own countrymen. Charles Murray did an incredible job of covering this and analyzing from the perspectives of American culture splitting along class and education lines to the point that we're a pair of de facto separate societies. Herein Freeland analyze ...more
Jan 07, 2013 rated it really liked it
A well-researched overview of the steep income disparity that characterizes our current gilded age (the second robber baron era for the West and the first gilding for China, India and others). I enjoyed how Freeland offered both historical context and took repeated stabs at defining the psycho-social fallout of towering wealth built on dwindling resources and the consumerism of the creaking middle classes. The fallout, though, isn't actually the focus of Plutocrats. Rather Freeland simply tries ...more
Oct 15, 2012 rated it did not like it
If you truly, really genuinely believe that there's nothing wrong with our economy that can't be fixed by rich folks being a little bit less greedy, then you'll want to read this book. Unfortunately, like a certain presidential candidate, the author is not competent to present her own case. When a capitalist quotes Marx, as Freeland does, it's a bad sign. When she misreads him, along with much else, it's a sign of desperation. Used to be that Harvard graduates and Rhodes scholars were well equip ...more
Aug 03, 2018 rated it did not like it
I got to 42% and give up. I don't know what the book is about . Lots of name dropping and stories. ...more
Jan 01, 2013 rated it really liked it
If you were expecting Naomi Klein, you will be disappointed. Chrystia Freeland's Plutocrats is more pastiche than polemic. You will find some important information in respect to the growing income and wealth disparity in America and the world. For instance, 20% of Americans own 84% of the nation's wealth (compared to 36% in Sweden); in 1970 the top 1% took 10% of the national income, today they take over 30%; in 1980 the average CEO made 42x the wage of the average worker, today they make 390x t ...more
Conor Ahern
I ended up really liking this book, but it took a little while. As others have mentioned, the first 1/3 or so reads like a “Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous” and is devoted to explaining the trappings of extreme plutocracy and the ways by which the purseproud rich have bent the machinery of government and the economy to their wills and fortunes. Freeland, herself a Harvard graduate and a Rhodes Scholar—undoubtedly the single likeliest pedigree for shameful self-promotion and aggrandizement—does ...more
Jul 07, 2013 rated it liked it
For the past four years, Carlos Slim Helu, the Mexican self-made multi-billionaire, has topped the Forbes Billionaire list, with an estimated net worth of $73 billionaire as of March 31, 2013.

Do you know what that translates to? Carlos’ net worth is equal to about 400,000 of his fellow Mexicans.

A more often cited comparison is this: the combined incomes of Bill Gates and Warren Buffet equals the wealth of the bottom 40% of the nation.

Former Financial Times deputy editor Chrystia Freeland’s “Plut
Nov 21, 2012 rated it liked it
Entertaining reporting by a former Financial Times reporter on the rise of the 1% and what it all means. A lot of reporting and some very interesting anecdotes, although an even deeper analysis at times on why/how it all happened would've been helpful (she gets into that too, and I generally agree with the analysis, I just wanted even more details). Also, she seems to have a shallow understanding of so-called free-trade: apparently it's a fact of life for manufacturing workers, but highly skille ...more
Abhijit Selukar
Mar 26, 2013 rated it did not like it
Not sure if I should rate the bool.
The book is so mediocre that I had to stop half way into reading it. The book is nothing but verbalization of data gathered from sources all around the world.
The book does not provide any solution. Just plain Data.
The author has again taken advantage of the current turmoil for her benefit and released the book.If the book was released in 2006-07, no one would have cared.

Read this book if you are a socialist.
NOT recommended if you believe in capitalist ideolog
Kristine Morris
Sep 05, 2013 rated it really liked it
I read many of the reviews of this book, and while I have no doubt that experts in labour economics, the financial crisis and those who study of capitalism may disagree with some of what Freeland has written, for the average jane it provides a readable in-depth understanding of why the income divide is happening and why (most of) the plutocrats don't understand why the 99% might have a bit of a problem with their wealth generation.

The hardest chapter to read was the second last chapter when Free
Feb 04, 2013 rated it did not like it
Shelves: non-fiction
I quit after 55 pages of unorganized drivel about how wonderful it is to be a plutocrat. The author has clearly been rubbing elbows with her subjects too long. There are frequent allusions to winner and losers, and the poor and middle class must simply suck it up and deal, because having the ultra-wealthy around is somehow good for the rest of us. I had my suspicions about the book early on when Freeland unironically quoted the F. Scott Fitzgerald saw "the rich are different" without Hemingway's ...more
Oct 18, 2012 marked it as to-read
Heard an interesting interview with the author about this book on NPR, at

Looking forward to reading it. But not when I'm depressed :)
Amanda Rose
Jan 01, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2013
The bits where the super rich look like creepy nuts in their own words were my favourite bits and why it gets a 4 despite one could always quibble about the political economy of some other bits.
Jan 23, 2014 rated it really liked it
Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else by Chrystia Freeland

“Plutocrats” is an insightful look at both the economics and politics of the super-elite class. Canadian writer, journalist and politician Chrystia Freeland provides the readers with an inside look at plutocrats. It’s an interesting look at how plutocrats live their lives and how they earn their fortunes, and the impact it has on the rest of us. This interesting 335-page book includes the followin
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
1% in American Hi...: Freeland and Taibbi on Bill Moyers 1 3 Dec 11, 2014 12:53PM  
1% in American Hi...: Plutocrats (the book) 1 6 Dec 11, 2014 08:25AM  
Twitter Male Book...: Week 1 reading assignments and questions 1 4 Feb 20, 2013 08:57PM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Land of Big Numbers
  • Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right
  • Twilight of the Elites: America After Meritocracy
  • Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power
  • Bailout: An Inside Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street
  • Тигролови
  • Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America
  • Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle
  • No Higher Honor: A Memoir of My Years in Washington
  • Bihar Diaries
  • Surviving Autocracy
  • All Things Being Equal: Why Math Is the Key to a Better World
  • The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America
  • The Yankee Years
  • Greedy Bastards
  • 100 Baggers: Stocks That Return 100-To-1 and How to Find Them
  • Double Down: Game Change 2012
  • War: How Conflict Shaped Us
See similar books…
Chrystia Freeland is the Global Editor-at-Large of Reuters news since March 1, 2010, having formerly been the United States managing editor at the Financial Times, based in New York City. Freeland received her undergraduate education from Harvard University, going onto St Antony's at University of Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. She attended the United World College of the Adriatic, Italy, 1984-86.


News & Interviews

The coming season is a big one for the science fiction and fantasy genres, with the release of some of 2021's most anticipated speculative...
100 likes · 71 comments
“Americans were happy to celebrate their super-rich and, at least sometimes, worry about their poor. But putting those two conversations together and talking about economic inequality was pretty much taboo.” 5 likes
“A 2011 OECD report showed that, over the past three decades, in Sweden, Finland, Germany, Israel, and New Zealand--all countries that have chosen a version of capitalism less red in tooth and claw than the American model--inequality has grown as fast as or faster than in the United States. France, proud, as usual, of its exceptionalism, seemed to be the one major Western outlier, but recent studies have shown that over the past decade it, too, has fallen into line.” 3 likes
More quotes…