DNF.
Suffered through three chapters before my eyes cramped from rolling them and lips cramped from grimacing. Had to give up.
Spoliers follow:
Hero can't read very well or do math. He paid someone to do his assignements for him so he could get through Eaton (not certain that's possible since Eaton is like grade school, he couldn't have paid someone to take his in-class exams, supervised by instructors, and the difference in quality between homework and classwork would have been obvious, giving away his deceit.)
The hero joins the army. Then he sets up a new life in Paris as a gambler (no idea how old he is). The boy he paid in Eaton, now a solicitor, suddenly shows up (the man is described as rat-like) and declares that the hero has inherited an impoverished dukedom.
The hero does not want any responsibilities. He certainly does not want to have to deal with the written word or ledgers required of a Duke. The solicotor claims he will help the Duke with the responsibilities -- for the rest of his life.
Switch to the heroine, the Dowager Duchess of the estate the hero inherited. (Fact check: she becomes the Dowager Duchess when the current Duke marries, not when her husband dies.) She's 34 and in prison for treason because she gathered the people of the estate to confront the new Duke for his lack of attention.
The old Duke's mistress had the heroine arrested on charges of treason for revolting against the new Duke. (Who, BTW, was in Paris at the time of the event. How could they gather and revolt against a man who wasn't there?)
Wouldn't more evidence be required to charge a *peeress* of the realm than the word of a fallen woman and a constable? Due to her title, The Duchess would be tried in the House of Lords, not the lower courts.
The heroine is released because the new Duke came to a hearing and claimed she was insane. On his word alone, she was released to return to the Duke's impoverished estate.
After the French revolution, Eurpoean Aristocrats feared insurrection in their own countries. They would not have taken the charge of treason (or insanity) lightly.
Okay, would a traitor (if anyone really believed the accusation) be released based soley on the word of a new Duke, a man who never even met with the woman? (A man who has been living in Paris and not suspected of treason by associateion?)
Wouldn't a doctor need to examine and then certify her insane and then the Duke must promise to incarserate the insane traitor to make certain she did not incite the people to revolt? Would she even be allowed to return to the estate? Or would special hospitalization be required (not Bedlum which was for the lower classes and the poor).
On the way from the prison, (in a coach and eight???) with the help of a grubby boy from the estate, the heroine slips out of the carriage and walks to the Duke's townhouse. (A Duchess, even an impoverished one, with loyal servants, would have more resources available than one grubby boy).
She assumes the man who opens the door to the townhouse is the butler(the most beautiful butler she has ever seen). (It's the hero. Surprise!!). He assumes she is the whore he ordered (he sleeps with a different woman every night).
While sharing chicken soup and bread, made by the Duke, they both realize their errors. (Chicken soup from scratch takes hours to boil a flavorful broth before deboaning the chicken, condensing the broth and adding chopped vegetables. Making a stew is easier than soup since it doesn't require making broth first. Bread takes around four hours - a little less when using a bread machine. At this time in history, there are no canned foods, refrigeration, preservatives, plastic bags or plastic containers to keep food fresh for months. Bread was made daily because it became stale by the next. Did the Duke slave over a hot stove/oven the entire day? But I digress.)
Meanwhile, the boy who came to help the heroine sets fire to the townhouse by tipping over a lamp.
After accusing the duchess of setting the fire (though the H/h had been in each other's company since she arrived), the hero refuses to fight the fire. He would rather see the place burn than take responsibility for the place.
The heroine rushes in to put out the blaze. Of course, the hero must then rush in to save her and reluctantly help put out the fire, if only to make certain the entire city of London does not become ablazed.
After the fire is out, the duke insists that the heroine take a bath. Really? That is all he has to say for himself? Insensitive coward.
Oh, yeah. There is some type of curse mentioned, not well described. But it's soemthing like: the New Duke will die within one year of gaining the title.
So, of course, the heroine wants him to return to the estate, marry and procreate before the year is up, even though she does not believe in the curse. Yeah, and if this curse is thrue, he must be something like the 3675t Duke since a new one would take posession every year.
So here's a question: Why did the old Duke marry a 33 year old woman, one never married before, one not guaranteed to be fertile, in order to sire an heir? Women over twenty five were considered beyond the marriagelable age for the aristos because the younger the woman, the more fertal. Modern women can argue differently. But the truth is, a woman's fertility rate drops the older she gets. At age 34, it drops significantly, especially if she has never carried a child to full term before. And that is the fact of being a woman. So if the old Duke loved his mistress, why did he marry a 33 year old spinster to beget an heir?
My eyes are rolling again.
I don't like heros who refuse to take care of their responsibilites. I don't like heros who are cowards or weak in character. I don't like heros who lack self-confidence especially after they have reached 25 years of age. I don't like heros who are not intelligent enough to read and do math (unless they have a medical or physical condition, such as blindness or dyslexia), or too weak to overcome the affliction, or too cowardly to find ways to cope with the affliction. Giving up never solves anything.
So, I did not like this hero.
I didn't much like the heroine either.
And it's obvious the solicitor is taking advantage of the hero's learning disability to embezzle the Dukedom's funds. Too obvious for me to wonder how the book ends. The solicitor did it.
Most of all, I didn't like the logical and histoical errors.
I prefer historical romances that try to recreate the society and values of the time. This novel has aristos behaving like common laborers, without servants, with bad manners. All in all these nobles lack nobility.