What do you think?
Rate this book


302 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1985
I wanted to re-read the Guardians of the Flame books and it was a mistake. This is another series I originally read as a teen or pre-teen, thanks to my dad's orders from the Science Fiction Book Club. We had two omnibus volumes, The Warriors and The Heroes and as a child, I really enjoyed their stories of American college students transported to a fantasy world. In my memory, it was like the Dungeons & Dragons Show but with more of a continuous plot.
Decades later, I read the first two and then halted about a third of the way through the third before I just couldn't continue. They are awful. Not awful in the "cheesy dumb fantasy" kind of way. More like, awful in the "increasingly morally offensive the more I read" kind of way.
Sexual assualt is a big plot element in these books, and it's handled in a not-great way [male authors: maybe never make this a plot point?]. But that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the problems with these books.
No, the big problem is that the overarching plotline is an emerging guerilla war between our heroes [sic] and the slave-based economy of the fantasy world they've become trapped in. And the whole slavery edifice here is revealed to be just a narrative excuse allowing the books' main characters to engage in military tactics and oh so many ways to viciously kill a bunch of evil slavers.
Ok, sure, Rosenberg was trying to make a point here — that a medieval fantasy a la D&D or Middle Earth would not be glamorous or enjoyable. Medieval life was grim and brutal, he is clearly stressing. Hobbesian, you might say. And the good guys spend a lot of effort spreading modern technology and principles like "slavery is evil" in a transparent defense of stereotypical Western values like the Protestant work ethic and Enlightenment liberty.
But as I read one scene after another where the main characters planned and then executed careful plans to murder slavers, the whole premise fell apart piece by piece. This stuff is brutal. How many ways can you murder a slaver? And who the fuck are these slavers? They are generic bad guys who are evil by definition, and so the books seem to think it's fine if they are being constantly tortured and murdered. (Kind of like how terrorists in pop culture are generic evil characters.)
But nothing here makes any sense. The argument made by the characters runs like this: attacking slave caravans will make the cost of capturing new slaves rise exorbitantly and undermine the basis of the slave economy. So it's an economic argument. But, like, if you want to talk about economics. What is going on in this fantasy world?? There are zillions of slaves, slave markets, slave raids to capture more slaves, palaces full of slaves. It's slaves slaves slaves everywhere. Chattel slavery, with chains and everything. But what are the slaves doing? What do they eat? What possible advantage do they give to the slaveholders? These made-up slaves aren't laboring on farms or cotton fields or tobacco plantations or mines or whatever. Slavery here exists in order for slavers and slaveholders to be cruel and evil, so that the heroes can kill them with their cleverly-devised weaponry and military tactics.
I wouldn't go so far as to say slavery is off-limits in fantasy fiction. But it can't just be a window-dressing excuse for allowing characters to kill unrepentantly. There is a dark current running through these books that delights in the savagery, thrills to the development of new killing technologies, and is grateful for the evils of slavery so that there is still reason to keep on killing. It's sick and I wish I had never picked these books up again.