Brilliant craic...or just meaty literary celebrity gossip?
I picked this book somewhat under the false impression that this was the basis for Baz Ashmawy's adventure series involving his provocative exploits for his good sport "mammy", Nancy. How wrong could I be?
Well, the only common denominator is an Irish connection as both Baz & the author are Irish, but there the similarity ends. For this book is a look at the family relationships, both with parents and siblings, that spawned the writers and their novels. There's no actual parricide, matricide, patricide or fratricide here and minimal thrill-seeking, let alone a good sport!
Apart from the 1st chapter, they're largely about a single writer, albeit with some fleeting influential mentors, split into 2 parts; "Ireland" and "Elsewhere", which in reality is the American continent. Originally either essays or lectures, they certainly emphasise the dysfunctional nature of many of the novelist's families featured, that maybe enhanced the creative spirits which they later became, as well as the utilisation of their family's personalities also their own, to create their novel's characters. However, apart from the occasional mention of Freud, there's zero psychoanalytic theory, so much of this is conjecture.
The writer moves in academic circles these days and his research and wide reading around these individual subjects is clearly exemplary: he has written a well-known and well-regarded book on Henry James. Who am I to criticise these excellently written pieces? Just merely an ignorant reader!
I am not cognisant of many of the authors mentioned within, with the exception of Jane Austen, Tennessee Williams and Roddy Doyle. The chapter involving Roddy Doyle and specifically his book about his grandparents, "Rory and Ita" looks possibly more about the social history within Ireland at the time, than their family relationships per se.
That on "Tennessee Williams and the Ghost of Rose" looks in depth at his older sister's deteriorating mental health and consequent symptomatology and the effects on his writing. It certainly matches my thoughts on some of his work, "The Glass Menagerie", "The Night of the Iguana", to name but a couple. However, his grandmother, also Rose, features in some of his short stories as does his 'volcano' of an alcoholic father and these are certainly well realised by Tennessee himself.
The only dissonant tone, however, in an otherwise interesting volume was the 1st chapter. Why, if you're discussing Jane Austen in her "motherless" fiction, which is, specifically, "Emma" and "Persuasion", do you then concentrate on "Mansfield Park" and "Pride and Prejudice"? Whilst I agree the latter are her most nuanced and complex books, this doesn't accord with the title. But two recently written books, Ruth Perry's "Novel Relations" and Rupert Christiansen's "The Complete Book of Aunts" seems to be the excuse for ensuring that these chosen books take centre stage and also why the author's pet interest, Henry James, suddenly materialises. I was left with the distinct impression that the narrative was being moulded to the author's argument.
As a first chapter, it didn't help my enthusiasm for this otherwise fine book that Henry Crawford (of MP fame) was accorded 2 sisters when it's integral to the novel's plot that his 1 sister, Mary, shares his amoral behaviour in a codependent fashion! And that Fanny Price(ditto) has a 'dead' mother; she's there, just not part of the story! I think it helped to read this chapter as an epilogue to demonstrate the 'fictional families' that authors utilise to populate their novels rather than a prologue. But, at the end, I suppose that novelists create fiction whereas biographers, certainly good ones, deal with facts: and the two rarely come in one mind, in my limited experience!
'..all fiction comes from a direct source and makes its way indirectly to the page or the stage. It does so by finding metaphors, by building screens, by working on half truths, moulding them towards a form that is both pure and impure fabrication. There is simply no other way of doing it. Most plays, novels and stories use the same stealthy process...Fiction, by its very nature, is a form of deceit.'p.165
Overall, a book more of interest possibly to English literature students than casual readers unless you enjoy literary criticism.
3.75* rounded up.