It's sweet. It's charming. And I think my response is partly affected by it's reputation.
I read a few Madeline books when I was a kid. I remember watching a couple of Madeline cartoon specials we got from the library. I ESPECIALLY remember the Madeline computer game my sister and I would play on our old Windows 95.
Needless to say, Madeline was a part of my childhood. And it's hard for me to think of a time when Madeline (and other famous children's characters) weren't so ubiquitous.
I'm not suggesting that Madeline's place in our culture is undeserved. Ludwig Bemelmans created a sweet character who went on exciting adventures that showcased the charm and splendor of France, particularly Paris. The Madeline books are endless endearing, in large part because of their simple art and color scheme. They are, if nothing else, a treat to look at.
I bring all this up because, when I review things, I tend to focus on the plot and the characters, because I fancy myself a writer. And I qualify all this because I think that Madeline weren't such an established presence in my childhood and in the childhoods of so many, then I might not have enjoyed the story of Madeline's Christmas as much. It's simple, it's sweet, and there are magic flying carpets. What more do you need? Yet, I think if this wasn't Madeline, if this was some new children's book character, I'd be asking myself, "Wait . . . is that it?"
It's curious to review older books because so much of what has come out since then is based on how those older books established and shaped the medium. My knowledge of older children's literature is limited, and so I cannot say how complicated a story Madeline is compared to other children's books that came out at the time. But I get the impression that children's literature of a bygone era was, in some ways, simpler storytelling. Basic, if that word didn't carry with it such negative connotations. And though the language of children's lit (particularly picture books) has stayed simple, it feels like the stories have become more complex, because audiences expect more.
Pure speculation, of course, I don't know if any of this true. But that is what I was thinking of as I read Madeline's Christmas. No matter the circumstances, it is a good book, and worth reading. But Madeline is one of those properties that, for me at least, cannot be read without also considering its place in the timeline.