Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “When Computers Were Human” as Want to Read:
When Computers Were Human
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

When Computers Were Human

4.05  ·  Rating details ·  38 ratings  ·  5 reviews
Before Palm Pilots and iPods, PCs and laptops, the term "computer" referred to the people who did scientific calculations by hand. These workers were neither calculating geniuses nor idiot savants but knowledgeable people who, in other circumstances, might have become scientists in their own right. When Computers Were Human represents the first in-depth account of this lit ...more
Paperback, 411 pages
Published September 16th 2007 by Princeton University Press (first published February 22nd 2005)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about When Computers Were Human, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about When Computers Were Human

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.05  · 
Rating details
 ·  38 ratings  ·  5 reviews

Sort order
Brian Borchers
Aug 18, 2017 rated it it was amazing
There has been a lot of interest recently in the history of computing before the advent of digital computers, and particularly the role that women played as computers (a job title) in the first half of the twentieth century. The book and Movie, Hidden Figures, described a group of black women who worked as computers at the NACA and later NASA laboratory at Langley VA. Rise of the Rocket Girls gave an oral history of women computers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. Grier's book is co ...more
Bradley Roth
Dec 11, 2017 rated it really liked it
Fascinating history of human computers.
Dec 23, 2010 rated it liked it
Shelves: retro-computing
The first electronic digital computers were made in the early 1940s, and dozens more were built in the late 1940s and the early 1950s. How was computing done before that? The French Revolution introduced not only a new calendar and a new system of weights and measures, but also division of the right angle into 100 grades instead of 90 degrees. New trigonometric tables needed to be prepared for surveyors, who might lose their revolutionary fervor if they had to convert grades to degrees and use t ...more
Jan 05, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Remember the team sport of complex calculations?

Usually, the word “computer” generates images of a powerful, programmable machine that can perform almost any task. However, a “computer” was originally a person who performed complex math. Some “human computers” were scientists who did advanced calculations, but most were workers who labored over the same types of adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing hour after hour, day after day. Scientist David Alan Grier weaves a wonderful story of t
Jim Razinha
Mar 31, 2014 rated it really liked it
I once looked up "computer" in a 1937 dictionary and read "one who computes". This book is a nice, if dry, history about those who computed in the days before digital took over...astronomy, navigation, ballistics, weather, census...the math tables are mind boggling, and I used many (Chemical Rubber Company anyone?)

I had a little nostalgia in the last chapter...Grier talked about two mainframes that marked the definite end to human computing - the IBM 360 and UNIVAC 1108 - both of which I wrote a
David Baron
rated it really liked it
Mar 20, 2017
rated it really liked it
Feb 23, 2015
rated it liked it
Aug 09, 2016
Andy Ganse
rated it really liked it
Feb 03, 2011
rated it really liked it
Aug 13, 2010
Samir Passi
rated it it was amazing
Jan 01, 2016
Hannah Gray
rated it really liked it
Sep 12, 2017
rated it really liked it
Mar 19, 2008
Paul Bleisch
rated it really liked it
Sep 26, 2017
Karl Mendonca
rated it really liked it
Feb 18, 2015
rated it liked it
May 28, 2018
rated it it was amazing
Apr 24, 2016
Timothy Griffin
rated it liked it
Oct 14, 2011
rated it it was amazing
May 11, 2017
Ben Deane
rated it it was ok
Nov 20, 2012
rated it really liked it
Apr 30, 2012
rated it really liked it
Nov 05, 2018
Erin Leafe
rated it really liked it
Mar 01, 2017
Vesna Kovach
rated it it was amazing
Sep 12, 2015
Arjun Narayan
rated it it was amazing
Dec 21, 2014
rated it it was ok
Apr 29, 2017
rated it really liked it
Jan 20, 2011
rated it it was amazing
Dec 15, 2011
rated it liked it
Dec 14, 2014
rated it really liked it
Nov 14, 2012
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Goodreads is hiring!

If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »
Professor at George Washington University
“The structure of de Prony’s computing office cannot be easily seen in Smith’s example. His computing staff had two distinct classes of workers. The larger of these was a staff of nearly ninety computers. These workers were quite different from Smith’s pin makers or even from the computers at the British Nautical Almanac and the Connaissance des Temps. Many of de Prony’s computers were former servants or wig dressers, who had lost their jobs when the Revolution rendered the elegant styles of Louis XVI unfashionable or even treasonous.35 They were not trained in mathematics and held no special interest in science. De Prony reported that most of them “had no knowledge of arithmetic beyond the two first rules [of addition and subtraction].”36 They were little different from manual workers and could not discern whether they were computing trigonometric functions, logarithms, or the orbit of Halley’s comet. One labor historian has described them as intellectual machines, “grasping and releasing a single piece of ‘data’ over and over again.”37 The second class of workers prepared instructions for the computation and oversaw the actual calculations. De Prony had no special title for this group of workers, but subsequent computing organizations came to use the term “planning committee” or merely “planners,” as they were the ones who actually planned the calculations. There were eight planners in de Prony’s organization. Most of them were experienced computers who had worked for either the Bureau du Cadastre or the Paris Observatory. A few had made interesting contributions to mathematical theory, but the majority had dealt only with the problems of practical mathematics.38 They took the basic equations for the trigonometric functions and reduced them to the fundamental operations of addition and subtraction. From this reduction, they prepared worksheets for the computers. Unlike Nevil Maskelyne’s worksheets, which gave general equations to the computers, these sheets identified every operation of the calculation and left nothing for the workers to interpret. Each step of the calculation was followed by a blank space for the computers to fill with a number. Each table required hundreds of these sheets, all identical except for a single unique starting value at the top of the page. Once the computers had completed their sheets, they returned their results to the planners. The planners assembled the tables and checked the final values. The task of checking the results was a substantial burden in itself. The group did not double-compute, as that would have obviously doubled the workload. Instead the planners checked the final values by taking differences between adjacent values in order to identify miscalculated numbers. This procedure, known as “differencing,” was an important innovation for human computers. As one observer noted, differencing removed the “necessity of repeating, or even of examining, the whole of the work done by the [computing] section.”39 The entire operation was overseen by a handful of accomplished scientists, who “had little or nothing to do with the actual numerical work.” This group included some of France’s most accomplished mathematicians, such as Adrien-Marie Legendre (1752–1833) and Lazare-Nicolas-Marguerite Carnot (1753–1823).40 These scientists researched the appropriate formulas for the calculations and identified potential problems. Each formula was an approximation, as no trigonometric function can be written as an exact combination of additions and subtractions. The mathematicians analyzed the quality of the approximations and verified that all the formulas produced values adequately close to the true values of the trigonometric functions.” 0 likes
More quotes…