Bryce is one of those Assers wise (sic) who delights in saying only what current opinion says we *can’t know,* then enjoys going on to re-interpret - ‘exactly’ in his mind - the motives of these various sacred Hathor/Hattusha, and not so very sacred at all Itti’s, motives. Should I mention the latter are listed in Westerners sacred writ as one of the most bloody, baal loving, micro-orchestrating “fallen cainanite” peoples in such said writ? No, too controversial.
All that these variant peoples lived and died for (or killed for sport for, as to the Ittis), all their motives, Bryce carefully re-explains using only his limited, recent, utilitarian, neo-economical, ‘real-politik’ schtick - oh, along with a few shards of pottery.
Truly he owes everything, as he expresses in his acknowledgement, to Professor Silvin Košak. And his scant sources he quotes from - rather than thousands of Hittite texts and historians from all centuries and surrounding nations speaking on exactly these conflicts at these times, in these areas - are merely, basically, nata except as follows: Edel, Wiseman, Hauptman (who snow jobbed forever our most extensive finds to date of the Chalcolithic period so unknown to man now, namely NorsunTeppe and Samisdat Mega Temples in Turkey they built ponds over and sunk though they are larger than the temples in Giza and revealed the most important peoples of the ancient days!!! You should look into who financed Hauptman, by the way, I can’t even say the name as moderns are so potty-trained to sleepishly preconscious preen when any say such names that they might quickly call them “conspiracy theorists” and then calmly blink off without any active mentation of their own), Hoffner, Maeir and a very few, select, translated Hittite texts.
So I will close here by saying just two things.
First, if I had a dollar for every time a scholar giddishly decryed “alas we still await publication,” or “alas these seem to have been misplaced or lost,” for example on the “over 3,000 tablets discovered at Sapinuwa,” he mentions in the preface (and endless finds like such we could add to this), I would be a very rich man; in converse degree to mankind now who is very poor in knowledge as modern a-historic ‘it’s’ principly because all such exact finds are, as a rule, almost never made public to them at all and never will be.
And second, rather than beginning all his history, he proceeds to lay out, at 1886 BC, where it should begin, and where old dating on the Hittites and on KhaMu(she)Rabbi once placed all such correctly (the latter’s accession being in 1826), he quickly dismisses over said old chronology and starts it all 236 years too late at 1650 BC just one century before the Deucalion conflagration!
And this, even though Newton warned, totally unheeded, in his excellent work on chronologies, how these 236 extra years were taken out of most histories and dissimulated with each other quite specifically, chronologically.
This changes and makes a-historic and impossible to alocate anything he further says at that point; dislocates all and any of his data from actual, broader, historic records of events going on in those said days.
I have nothing further to say, except, just find the translations of the tablets from these times directly that are not about barley and the tethering of horses (very hard to do) and then find the hundreds of chronologers from surrounding areas near such times as we already possess in great number who spoke on the migrations and conflicts and peoples and cultures in these areas, instead.