This book falls into a modern trap; the tendency to make feminism synonymous with ALL current progressive movements. It is a tendency, a scope creep that I have never accepted. The author acknowledges this when she writes,
The misconceptions
around what feminism is can also be related to the multitude of feminisms
that now exist. I do not have the authority — no one has — to decide what
feminism is and what it isn’t. However, I can say that feminism to me is
bigger than gender equality, it’s bigger than women; it’s a social project, a
vision of how things could be if we ditched the culture of domination that
the patriarchy nurtures. In a patriarchal world, people take, use and throw
away. In a feminist world, people would prioritise care. It’s a bold claim,
some will say, but it sounds a bit naive. It is true that I probably wouldn’t
have written that when I started thinking about what I wanted to do with
this book. However, as I searched for progressive alternatives to the
conservative ideas I’ll be criticising in this book, I was almost
systematically redirected to feminist literature, in all its diversity. I
concluded that intersectional feminism offered some of the best answers to
the challenges of our time. Sure, feminism won’t come up with a protocol
on how to decarbonise our economies. It is not a program, an authoritative
force, but an invitation to boldly rethink the basis upon which we make
society.
This tendency to make feminism everything might be the real reason it is collapsing - if it is collapsing. It may be because any movement trying to be everything will inevitably fail at lots of things. If you define a fish as a creature that can swim and can ride a bicycle, then we can say that fishes are failing at being fishes.
To take an example, in the conclusion of the book, she writes, Women were incentivised to join the workforce to participate in the
economy, become financially independent and find meaning outside the
home. Some privileged classes of women did benefit from their inclusion in
the workplace. However, other classes of women feel overworked,
exploited and unfulfilled. They don’t dream of labour, they don’t want to
put all their energy into developing a career, some can’t even afford an
education or a life outside work. Now is the time to change our approach, to
ditch the “bullshit jobs” and bring back meaning into work. To do that,
people must work less so that they can invest time in other forms of work
like housekeeping (for all, not just women), gardening, community work,
volunteering, education, politicisation and leisure activities like creating art
or doing sports. “Sure, a lot of it would be nonsense”, said anthropologist
David Graeber, “but it’s hard to imagine a full 40-50% would be doing
nonsense, and that’s the situation we have today”, he added in reference to
the amount of people who think their job is “bs”.
This is an expansion of the scope of feminism. The goal of feminism was not necessarily to find meaning outside the home; it was the freedom to not be restricted to the sphere of the home. Whether or not meaning could be found at work was left to philosophers and theologians. A feminism that cannot look back at the expanded freedom of women to work, unlike before, with a sense of satisfaction is a feminism that will see itself collapsing because it has saddled itself with the project of giving people the means to fill their lives with meaning. A feminism that does not look back at increasing gender equality in the family with satisfaction is one that will see itself collapsing because it has acquired the extra burden of redefining family to include friendship and society. The author's feminism is collapsing because it even has the burden of preventing climate change and pollution.
All through the book, what the reader will encounter is not a collapsing feminism, but challenges to various progressive conceptions of work, sex, relationship, family, the environment, and society. I am too old to sweep all those into an all-encompassing feminism umbrella. When the author says feminism is collapsing, don't be fooled into thinking that the rights of women are collapsing. What you need to keep at the back of your mind is that this is the collapse of a feminism that is buckling under the weight of its ever-increasing cosmic scope.