(Spoilers)
Let me start off with the backstory. Or LACK of backstory, I should say. You see, in the very beginning little is known about why Mike McIntyre wants to do this journey. Yes he eventually tells us why...(he’s a travel journalist but doesn’t feel accomplished, has a beautiful girlfriend—appears to have grown bored with the relationship) but it feels like little more than half a sentence of reasoning and then bam. Mike up and decides to make his way across America without using money. There you go. THE END. That’s the premise of the story.
Mike just wanted to see if he could make it across America without using money, as a test while “rediscovering himself” and wanting to find out just how "Kind" America was.
But really? That was it?
What were you trying to find Mike? Give me (us, the readers) a reason to care! I still don’t effectively realize through such little information as to why he'd want to force hardship upon himself like this…nor what he was ultimately hoping to achieve because we're left with vague and spacey answers. Maybe he was running away from something. OHHHH! Yes! That’s right. See, we get a little more insight 10 to 11 chapters into the book in the form of one sentence which he explains to a meth dealer and hustler that pimps out his hooker girlfriend—that he (Mike) basically told his boss he didn’t want to take his crap anymore (though in the beginning of the book, his brazen attitude with his boss was far less thrilling than that exaggerated statement made to the drug dealer).
Furthermore Mike's girlfriend gets no attention or real mention other than how they met over the span of a paragraph. Honestly, by the end of the book it appears as if she had no care that he was about to embark on not only a dangerous journey but an epic one as well. We would never KNOW she even cared, because Mike doesn’t give us any sort of insight into the relationship—keeping it closely guarded maybe for privacy purposes, but still. How am I supposed to see myself as the author/traveler and follow in his journey and feel a part of what and how he feels without gaining ANY insight into what his partner thinks about his leaving? Mike references how he doesn’t ever want to call his girlfriend because it could make him weak. I found that odd, only because I have always used the encouragement of others to push me along when I felt no determination of my own…so I felt it strange to hear that, but hey, everybody is different.
Still, you get this sense of his wanting to be free from the relationship without exactly saying it.
This is mostly due to his consistent physical descriptions of the women he encounters, their ample, or lacking body parts and “assets” and how attractive he finds them. Each and every story we hear is mostly from guys explaining how they “cheated on their wives” or were “womanizers that decided to change” and suddenly you start to get this overall image that Mike is either 1. Seriously hard up for sex. Or 2. Mike is looking for permission and/or a reason to move on and sleep around while on his journey without feeling guilt for doing so.
I felt like keeping his love life out of the loop, was odd as I now have no character description of him to really go on, aside from his humble attitude and "blank slate expression" when he's not being afraid. I find it hard to relate with the guy.
I do however like how Mike immediately jumps into the action from the start of the book. I just felt the story could use flashbacks or dream sequences, or SOMETHING to explain in further depth his desires and what he was hoping to get from this in the end. Some sort of real attainable goal, other than the sudden drop off at the end that leaves you thinking "Well, he made it. Okay, guess the books over now".
There have been many negative reviews from people on here, unable to believe how kind people treated Mike while he was out on his adventure. Having lived homeless and a nomad/drifter myself, I found people are far nicer than we're led to believe. I’ve been in so many of the scenarios Mike's explained with complete strangers offering everything to you....not necessarily because you asked but because they KNEW you needed it.
I loved the way Mike reiterated this because it really is true. The world is not as evil and dark, and bad as movies and media make it out to be. People don’t generally see someone hitching on the side of the road and think “Man, I sure do wish I could RUN THAT GUY OVER!” In fact, they are more scared of YOU, than the hitch hiker is of THEM.
I suppose I could say, I feel Mike went out to rediscover himself in a sense and what he wanted to do with the rest of his life. Yet even still this was an awkward presumption considering his job, which included traveling the world as a journalist.
All we're left with is assumptions. I know you can leave aspects open to keep the reader guessing so that they can feel involved by IMAGINING their own reasons – but you do that to the point that it’s simply FRUSTRATING.
Mike McIntyre wanted to test America. Or at least his "idea" of what he thought America was, however naive and ignorant that might’ve been. Because you can’t base a nations response of kindness on 40 - 50 people you came in contact with on your journey out of hundreds of millions to be fair. But we also don’t generally all live with the need to randomly walk up and start killing each other either, so your book title wholeheartedly rings true. The term for what Mike was experiencing was "wanderlust".
When I was purposefully homeless for 8 and a half months myself, it was because I’d never been in an airplane or on a train. I had lived in one town for 32 years and never been to more than the 5 surrounding states. I was a sheltered hermit with a thirst for adventure that did nothing but get up, go to work, come home every day until I finally snapped, quit my job, sold everything I owned and left it all behind.
Yet I keep coming back to how odd it was for McIntyre to have had this amazing life of traveling across the world as a journalist, interacting with people and cultures all over, and finding it such a tedious career in that he needed to elope on a spiritual journey as a result. It ultimately gives me the feeling that he really just wanted to write a book about one singular epic experience....such as this test for example, to make it across the US with no help. If only for a newspaper article or a cover story.
And despite a few grammatical errors, I enjoyed this and even laughed a few times at his descriptions and scenarios.
Now I won’t chastise the guy for not being religious because honestly I could use a helpful dose of religion myself. I do find it a little strange that for a guy who has so little to believe in, he utilizes the kindness of Christians and church goers throughout his journey to feed him and offer him places to sleep. As if he expects their kindness solely because of their faith and I have to admit; I find that just a little bit forward of him. In fact I’d have an easier time relating to him if he had acknowledged this at least. To say "Well I may not be a Christian but I know they’re a giving kind of bunch, so I might as well use them to help me along!". I’d have been okay with him just stating the obvious to the readers on what he expected and WHY he congregated towards religious groups when seeking food or shelter.
There were times when reading that I felt as if he was trying to convince us (the reader) not to be angry with what he was doing by accepting peoples gratitude. There’s no way around it. If you’re hungry and someone offers you food...take it. But Mike, don’t try to feed us some campy line where each and every single person goes into a long winded sudden preachfest, or says something to the effect of "Listen, I understand your journey. You shouldn’t be ashamed of taking peoples offer for food or a place to stay. We are doing this for a reason!" (Of which he always chooses the easiest answer for the person which is that of faith) at times it feels like a cop out.
You wanted to get across America without spending a dime and by only being offered food and bedding for free instead of paying for it. Accept that! And don’t be apologetic for it! If these people offered you help then they did it of their own volition. You didn’t hold them at gun point, right? So quit trying to make the reader feel empathetic and stop trying to divert flak you feel may be coming your way by giving us these obviously exaggerated campy lines from people urging you and what you’re doing along. You don't have to try to make us sympathize with you, because you have the money you need to complete the journey and instead of using it, you're choosing to not use it.
When I was homeless I asked for food because I was hungry. I could have gone home any time I wanted to family that cared, but I didn’t. I had too much pride. I didn’t accept money unless it was absolutely forced down my throat.
This doesn’t make you a bad person. You gave these no false pretenses. Quit feeling bad about it.
The most intriguing parts to me were the homeless shelter where Mike gets raw and gritty with detail and repeats the lines of a manic homeless man that is slowly bellowing in and out upon Mikes growing claustrophobia in that chaotic environment. He painted the perfect picture.
Yet sadly other parts read much like a journalists writes, with hard, straight to the fact style that doesn’t feel much like a story more than notes scribbled out like : "Alice looked rough from the night before. Mascara lines running down her worn face. Brought awake by the thudding next door, she shuffles across the room. Barbara watches, cold and unresponsive."
These quick little snips of sentences while telling a story just feel so rough and forcefully conformed. It causes you to want to take a break instead of plowing through, sometimes feeling exhausted with the stop and go text. But the break is fine because I always found myself wanting to come back to the book to see what was going to happen next.
Mike breaks character drinking beer and traveling with drug dealers and then you’re finally like "Thank you God! Maybe now we start finding adventure and things really start to take off now!"
But it never really gets more interesting than these few moments. This was a VERY good book, with some obvious flaws. You should definitely purchase this book. I’d rate it a 3 ½ if I could, but I can’t and a 4 is just too much to give for obvious mistakes and lack of backstory and the ability to make you feel involved.
+_+Side Note To Reviewers+_+
I also want to point out real quick. Some reviewers paint a negative picture of Mike because he's white. "Awww privileged white guy gets bored with having an easy life, a great job and nice car and decides to hike. Boo-hoo".
As if the author ever had any choice in what race and what gender he was brought into this world as.
As if depression or mental illness (Robin Williams?) Doesn’t affect the rich white people out there as well (still guessing here Mike, this is why more backstory is needed).
Depression isn’t a social or economic class, it’s a mental disability.
Some reviewers speak about Mike’s judgments of others, yet judging people is how we were born. It’s how as hunter gatherers – we survived. It’s the very reason we have facial expressions and read people’s faces. Its idiotic to believe nobody judges other people because it’s an evolutionary, biological trait and the foremost way we understand each other, and each others emotions. It’s also how we keep ourselves from harm. There are several examples where McIntyre judges people and finds out he’s wrong. Like the lady in the sweat pants and dirty shirt that picked him up and took him back to her trailer and broken home. He expected her house (based upon her personal appearance) to be a dump but was surprised by how wrong he was. He then goes on to admit how wrong he in fact was.
Pros:
1. Okay Story
2. Few grammatical errors, nicely edited and easy to read.
3. Characters stories would good and interesting, though he suffered mostly by ignoring himself and his partner.
4. Straight into the action from the very start. Wastes no time getting you hooked.
Cons:
1. Very stop and go. This wasn't enough to keep me away, but enough to keep me from reading all the way through in one sitting.
2. Abrupt Ending
3. We knew the girl was going to leave you from the start. You made it blatantly obvious throughout the book by showing disinterest in her through your words. I would've liked to have been lead along more, to "feel" your hurt, more than just witnessing it, shrugging and thinking "Oh well, sucks for him."