God bless this pretty powder-keg
Anyone who connects with the city of San Francisco recognizes the special excitement and danger they feel. In this place, many rules do not apply. We may soar, we may crash. No one will prevent our flight, and in all likelihood, no one will clean up our messy end. We do not feel the same way, anywhere else.
This atmosphere of exalted possibilities is not an accident, but the product of San Francisco’s accidental birth and orphaned development in the 19th century. The city sprang up to serve gold miners and the criminal elements who preyed on them. Reading this history, two things struck me: (1) How bad conditions were, and (2) how much remains the same, in the 21st century.
We come here to pretend, and to reinvent ourselves
San Francisco did not so much attract eccentric outlaws and religious fanatics as those characters washed up on its shores, expelled from more sensible communities. In fierce competition for scarce resources, language was twisted in a fashion that sounds remarkably recent:
The cost of practically every commodity and of every sort of personal service was on a par with that of lodging. There were few men willing to perform the necessary menial tasks, and those who did condescend to undertake such work not only charged accordingly but insisted upon grandiloquent titles calculated to disguise and dignify their labors. Thus, the few washerwomen in the town put out signs announcing “Clothing Refreshed”; the porters who handled the baggage of travelers called themselves “baggage conveyors and transporters,” and the waiters in the hotels and restaurants refused to respond unless addressed respectfully as “Mister Steward.” Fewer than a score of cooks were in private service, but they insisted, of course, upon being called “chefs.”
Individuals lived out their fantasies, like children whose parents left them alone too long:
Willie Coombs . . . thought he was George Washington and always wore a Continental uniform of tanned buckskin. To Willie Coombs the saloon was both General Headquarters and the White House. He appeared there each night with his maps and his state papers and over a glass of beer planned his battles and composed messages to Congress and foreign nations. Once he almost starved himself to death before his friends could convince him that he was no longer at Valley Forge.
Pleasure was always for sale, but mind the price
Alcohol
“Oh, King Alcohol!” cried Happy Jack. “Great is thy sway! Thou makest meaner creatures, kings, and the unfortunate fellow of the gutter forget his miseries for a while!”
The crime and debauchery of the early days of the Barbary Coast was accompanied by the gurgle of enormous quantities of liquor, the consumption of which probably reached its peak in 1890. In that year the city granted the right to sell beer, whisky and other intoxicating beverages to 3,117 places, or one for every ninety-six inhabitants. And there were at least two thousand blind pigs, or blind tigers, as speakeasies were called in those days, which operated without licenses.
And yes, opium was smoked, if the drunkards could hunt it down in Chinatown.
The fairer sex
For many years after its birth, San Francisco was almost exclusively populated by males. Pent up desire increased to nuclear levels.
By the end of 1852 there was no country in the world that was not represented in San Francisco by at least one prostitute.
It was a popular superstition in San Francisco for many years that a woman with auburn tresses was exceedingly amorous, and that a red-haired Jewess was the most passionate of all. A pimp who owned two or three such girls was on the highroad to fortune.
Crime was a way of life
Most of the prostitutes in San Francisco were, in fact, slaves. When disease or age destroyed their economic value, many were unceremoniously murdered. Their customers were robbed blind. Sailors arriving in San Francisco were often “Shanghai’ed,” kidnapped, then sold into slavery to a new captain.
Murders were always expected.
During the half-dozen years that followed Alcalde Geary’s first attempt to form a reputable municipal government, an average of almost two murders a day were committed in San Francisco—and at no time in that period did the city have a population of more than forty thousand. Robberies, assaults, and other crimes were so numerous that no effort was ever made to determine even their approximate number.
Law enforcement was a joke—this has not changed
If you overstay your parking meter in 21st century San Francisco, you can expect a hefty ticket, no exceptions. If you are attacked by a murderer, on the other hand, the police are likely to drive by slowly, wave at you, and wish you a good evening. Thus it ever was.
A recapitulation of California’s crime statistics for the year ending January 1, 1856, published by this journal, showed that 489 murders had been committed, about two-thirds of them in San Francisco. In the then largest city of California no murderer had been punished, although in other parts of the state six had been legally executed and forty-six hanged by mobs.
Let’s hear it for corrupt, incompetent government and outrageous deficit spending
The deficit for the single year ending March 12, 1855 was $840,000, and the annual message of the Mayor on that date showed that since the middle of 1851 obligations had been incurred amounting to $1,959,000, an enormous debt for a city with a population of less than fifty thousand. Later that same year a commission, appointed under an act of Legislature to fund the floating debt, recognized as valid indebtedness only a little more than $300,000. The remainder was repudiated.
Then, as now, we were proud of our badness
While most of San Francisco’s reputable citizens publicly bemoaned the iniquities of the Barbary Coast and performed lip-service in the many campaigns designed to eliminate its more objectionable features, secretly they were, for the most part, enormously proud of their city’s reputation as the Paris of America and the wickedest town on the continent. A tour of the district, under proper police supervision, was usually a part of the itinerary of the distinguished visitor to San Francisco, and if through some oversight it wasn’t, the distinguished visitor very frequently included it on his own account, for no area of similar size in the Western Hemisphere had been so widely publicized or was so universally known. And since comment upon the evils of the quarter was eagerly sought by the newspapers, few celebrities set foot in San Francisco without seeing it. Sarah Bernhardt always visited the Barbary Coast when she played in San Francisco on her frequent tours, and pleased local journalists immensely by declaring that she had found it more fascinatingly wicked than Montmartre. Anna Pavlowa, the famous dancer, often visited the dance-halls, and avowed that she had obtained many ideas for her own dance creations by watching the gyrations of the light-footed Barbary Coasters. And when John Masefield, now Poet Laureate of England, arrived in San Francisco some sixteen years ago, the first thing he said when he disembarked from a ferry-boat at Market Street was: “Take me to see the Barbary Coast.”
In spite of all this . . .
I love the place. Nowhere else have I felt so fully alive as in San Francisco. This well-written account of its evils only makes me love it more. It’s a sickness, I freely admit.