Told primarily by a sixty-year-old (unnamed) narrator, Delhi: A Novel begins with the narrator returning home to Delhi from a stint abroad, in time to catch up with his transgender prostitute lover Bhagmati. In between making love to Bhagmati and seducing every other woman he sets eyes on, the narrator also begins to talk about—sometimes to Bhagmati, sometimes to the other women—the history of Delhi. From Indraprastha, through to the Tomars; from the days of Balban to the Mughals. The narrators change as time passes. Now it’s a kayastha named Mussadi Lal, in Balban’s reign; now it’s Mir Taqi ‘Mir’. There’s Taimur, Nadir Shah, Bahadur Shah Zafar: each of them talking about his days, his experience with Delhi, his feelings.
I was at first a bit annoyed with the near-obsession with sex that seemed to predominate in the starting chapters, and to some extent till well into the book. Whether it was the main narrator or one of the secondary narrators (who, 1857 onwards, actually take centre stage), they seemed to have sex on their minds.
Then, with the onset of 1857 and the then-onwards almost unremitting turbulence, that focus on sex shifts, drastically. It’s still there, but its tone has changed. There’s the rape, the sexual violence perpetrated as a result of the revolt and its aftermath. There are Bahadur Shah and his queen, Zeenat Mahal, desperately turning to each other for some form of comfort, some echo of what had once been. Sex for the sake of pleasure has gone; it now takes either more vicious, or more poignant, forms.
I’ll admit that in the initial chapters of this book I was looking for good things to say about it. The descriptions of Delhi, its flora and fauna, were superb, of course, but that was all I liked. But then, once Singh went deep into the past—especially starting 1857—I remembered why (having read Train to Pakistan many years ago) I liked Singh’s writing so much. His characters are deeply nuanced, the dilemmas they find themselves in so relatable, their reactions so very human. Also, I was impressed by the way his characters’ voices are so distinctive, so different. In the 1857 section, for example, there are three narrators: Bahadur Shah; an Anglo-Indian woman named Ayesha Aldwell; and a Sikh soldier for the British named Nihal Singh—and all three ‘speak’ so differently, they can be recognized just by their words.
Highly recommended, not just as an emotional (yet accurate) narrative of Delhi’s history, but also as a story about people, about the way we think and behave, what moves us, what evil we harbour and what good.