"The sheer unexpectedness of such events bears equally against the view that revivals are conditioned by the preceding actions and efforts of Christians. Those who believe that a certain line of conduct or prayer must secure revival have history against them. Revivals come unheralded. They are, as Edwards witnessed in Northampton in 1735, 'The surprising work of God.' Of the Great Awakening of 1740 it is said that 'It broke upon the slumbering churches like a thunderbolt brushing out of a clear blue sky'." - Iain H. Murray
Revival. If you've been abiding in Christian circles for long, or short, it is a word you will hear on the lips of many-a-sincere-saint. You may even notice it advertised on the billboards and signs of some churches. So many of us believers pine for revival. We have tasted and seen that the Lord is good, as Psalm 34:8 says and that taste, that experience, sparks our spiritual hunger for more of God. Oh, so much more! But how do we get more? How can we enter in once again to that heavenly foretaste we were graciously granted? How can we see God move in the lives of our neighbors and friends and family members who have yet to drink of the Living water Jesus promised? How can the world be changed through revival? And why revival? Those are the questions that Mr. Murray touches on in this book.
I enjoyed most of this offering. Just the quotes cited within, from the Puritans and others, were worth the read (And there are a lot of quotes). I found some of my suspicions/thoughts about revival echoed within these pages.
This is one of those books I thought would end up being a 4 or even a 5 star for me but there were a couple of things that prevented that from happening. The first and foremost was that for all of the author's great research, studying, and quoting of past revivals and those used by God in them, I don't think he came to all the correct conclusions. He is a Cessationist and thoroughly convinced that history backs up his view. He asserted as much in the Appendix but his argument was weak. He basically said that Whitfield, Spurgeon, and other past saints believed as he did, therefore Cessationism is fact. To which I would reply, "Yes, they did. And No. It's not!" Cessationism is pure fiction. John Knox, Alexander Peden and others have demonstrated that the gifts of the Spirit were still in operation during their lifetimes, not to mention the early Church fathers and others throughout Church history. But Murray dismisses some of these historical expressions and even insinuated modern (Charismatic) ministers as being fanatics who aren't to be trusted because...because he and Whitfield and others say/said so.
The other issue I have is his application of fanaticism. I found his idea of fantacism rigid and would highly suspect that he would label Jonathan Edward's wife Sarah as a fanatic if she were alive today and reacted the way she did when she experienced a touch of God like she had during the Great Awakening. The point is I think he's a bit narrow and rigid in his idea of how people who are truly moved by the Spirit would/should respond.
He also emphasized that we can't make revival happen or continue, which I agree with. It is truly the work of our Sovereign God and His Holy Spirit. Yet, at times he seemed to suggest that if we had truly fit and equipped preachers revival would come. Here's a quote he referenced that I absolutely loved but think his use of it in this context undermined his argument that man can't make revival happen, only the Holy Spirit can -
"Robert Sample who wrote in 1897: 'The great want of today is a holier ministry. We do not need more stalwart polemics, more mighty apologists, or preachers who compass a wider range of natural knowledge, important as these are; but men of God who bring the atmosphere of heaven with them into the pulpit and speak from the borders of another world.'"²
2 Robert Sample, 'Effective Preaching', in the Presbyterian and Reformed Review, Philadelphia, April 1897, p. 295. (189)
Bringing 'an atmosphere of heaven' and speaking 'from the borders of another world,' if that isn't revival, I don't know what is.
When all is said and done regarding this book on revival, I'm glad I read it and think it's a good contribution to the subject matter. It's just there's some dirty bathwater that needs to be thrown out, in my opinion.