First published in 2002. In Cybertypes, Lisa Nakamura turn sour assumption that the Net is color-blind on its head. Examining all facets of everyday web-life, she shows that racial and ethnic stereotypes, or 'cybertypes' are hardwired into our online interactions: Identity tourists masquerade in chat rooms as Asian_Geisha or Alatiniolover. Web directories sharply delimit racial categories. Anonymous computer users are assumed to be white. Lively, provocative, Cybertypes takes up computer relationship between race, ethnicity and technology and offers a candid and nuanced understanding of identity in the information age.
very solid 3.5! productively examines the role of race in internet cultures, both in terms of how offline discourses of race enter the online world and how the online world does (and doesn’t) acknowledge/create alternative racial formations.
After thoroughly engaging with Nakamura’s work over the course of the semester, I’ve found her arguments increasingly fragmented and her methodological approach lacking in clarity and rigor. The deeper I examine them, the more annoyed I am. But in my class we examined her work as a hallmark of examination into the digital space and our identities existing in them.
Like ok, we do a lot of critical theory reading in media studies so this isn't my first rodeo, but something about her writing feels hard to track at time and becomes a bit ramble-y. She is obviously very innovative as this was written in 2002, I like how she critiques the racialized and gendered assumptions baked into supposedly universal digital spaces, very valid take. She brings about a good question I thought about a lot in my class: who bears the burden of virtual space? We blame users so heavily but aren't we just a result of the condition, like how much can you actively work against a system that's so poorly designed. I feel like I've grown very critical of everything I read, maybe just the feeling of growing up and realizing the world is on fire has turned me sour and pessimistic. UGH!
Disjointed, sometimes rambling, grossly outdated and obnoxiously critical theory centric Nakamura's Cybertypes is nonetheless a landmark early study into the racial and gender dynamics created by 'cyberspace'.
Nakamura brings up some very valid points and I enjoyed reading this book. I would've given it 4 stars but I had some problems with her methodologies, and I just couldn't quite get over it.
Really easy to read, especially for it's genre, and comprehensive without getting bogged down in super-intelligent academic ideas. Surprisingly enjoyable.