date
newest »
newest »
The ratio isn't unrealistic at all. Most fantasy books (most books) feature much fewer GSM characters than is realistic. You could go through 50 books and not find a single GSM character, especially if you were purposefully avoiding them. Consider the Magicians and Traitor trilogies to be correcting this difference. In total we have 6 major GSM characters across (so far) five books. Sure, it's perhaps a little higher than you might excpect for a randomly picked population the size of the books' cast. But it's not huge.It's never stated that this is an accurate representation. The author chose these characters to focus on. A large number of the characters are magicians, but that doesn't mean Kyralia is overrun with magic users. As for your point about economuc growth and diminished populations... I'm not going to go into that too much, but it is possible for lgb people to have kids (bisexuals obviously can, and orientation does not equal actions. It's made pretty clear that many people are probably hiding their sexuality). The culture of Kyralia is roughly medieval, and in those times the population was much smaller. Since they have superior healing skills it may be that their population is larger than their technology can support and so a higher rate of homosexuality is a good thing for society!
'All over the place'? There are six. It's not an agenda, it's just characters. If you have a problem with it? Fine. Go read something else, god knows if you want to avoid gay characters it's pretty easy. Don't begrudge minorities their representation in an already biased media.
Anna I have said what I came to say and can move on now, however, before I go I want you to know two things.I disagree with almost all of what you said, and I am pleasantly refreshed by your ability to state your opinion politely and in proper sentence/paragraph structure.
I hope you have a wonderful day, mine is slightly better for having read your post.
I can see this turning into a mudslinging contest like most healthy debates on here. Everyone's world is one sided to a certain extent, thats why its called a viewpoint. Its how a particular person sees it. Doesnt mean its right or wrong but we are all entitled to out opinions and though I happen to agree with Anna, that doesnt make James's opinion any less valid.
Claire wrote: "I can see this turning into a mudslinging contest like most healthy debates on here. Everyone's world is one sided to a certain extent, thats why its called a viewpoint. Its how a particular pers..."I don’t think James was trying to be disparaging at all and I happen to agree with him. There is an overabundance of rainbows here that make a reader ask why, what does it have to offer the plot, does it distract? I found it distracting as I could not fathom the why part. I am indifferent to people’s personal orientations and only note these ones as they distract from the actual story … but that is my 5c



If the ratio of main characters who are homosexual to main characters who are straight is an accurate representation of their preferences in the countries as a whole in the Magicians and Traitor trilogies I think economic growth would be stymied as the population diminished.
What I'm trying to say is that while I could have accepted several homosexual characters in the those two trilogies it feels like they are all over the place, as though there was a little too much agenda spilled onto what was otherwise a very entertaining fantasy story.