(I was going to remove the first two paragraphs but have decided to let them stand but if you want the considered, rather the vitruputive part of my review, skip to paragraph three)
Definitely one of the most disappointing books I have ever read because it was mediocre, which in ways is far worse than bad. I have things to say but I can't face saying them now.
What I will say is that after this obscenely ordinary novel which manages to plumb every cliche of growing up in an 'ethnic' family, neighbourhood, town and community along with every high school trope and, most of all, let us not forget that of being a closeted gay high school senior from an ethnic family in an ethnic neighborhood, town etc. wracked by racial tension, I will never, ever crack the cover of any of his more recent novels, most particularly his roman a clef of the good old ACT-UP days called 'Cristod0ra'.
I read an excerpt from this novel, or more probably of the novel in progress, ages ago (unfortunately I cannot remember the anthology) but it impressed me so much that it has sat not simply on my TBR list but on my to buy list but this took some time to accomplish because being based in the UK there are an awful lot of novels that never saw publication here and acquiring them, while not impossible, can be expensive. The excerpt was, in memory, wildly impressive, particularly the poor white boy, rich black boy plot which I thought unusual for 1997 (it was still unusual in 2020 when John Gordon Russell published 'Hark') and, from the excerpt I'd read, I imagined that story line was going to be the dominant one.
Unfortunately it wasn't, the main story was about Eric Fitzpatrick from a lower middle class Irish/Italian background in his a last year of high school before going, he hopes, to Yale while dealing with a complicated family (one sister is down syndrome another pregnant, there is grandmother slipping into senility and both parents working all hours to maintain their precarious hold on the bottom rungs of the American dream). Eric wants to escape his suffocating small town and family all of which is the stuff of a million American (and in a different way) UK novels. Then Brooks, a black boy at the local Prep school wanders int o his life and Eric all of a sudden has to deal with sex and race (there is a whole sub plot around racial conflict).
The real problem is that the gay/racial parts of the novel are really only there to add a certain 'spice' to Eric's rather dull and predictable tale of 'breaking away' (see the 1979 film of the same name). There is nothing wrong with a tale of a Italian or Irish working class family dealing with the world of the 1980s ('Secret Words' by Jonathan Strong and 'Quaspeck' by by Eric Gabriel Lehman do this wonderfully, though only 'Quaspeck' has a 'gay' sub plot). But Timothy Murphy handles his material with leaden obviousness that reminded me of the awful 'Through it Came Bright Colors' by Trebor Healey.
It is very difficult with mediocre novels like this to disentangle what the author thinks from the views expressed by his characters. When a character says "...(what) he cherished about America...was that anyone, even a poor inner city kid like him could get a top-notch education and achieve success...That's why America was so much better then Europe or Japan or anywhere else...where only a select few got to go on a pursue their dreams..." (page 173) there is no indication that the author intends us to understand that the character is talking horse shit. There is no irony or nudge-nudge to the reader that this is a very debatable view. Maybe Mr. Murphy believed it to be true? But when? in 1987 when the novel is set, or 1997 when it was published?
Unfortunately Mr. Murphy's blindness to complexities is most jarring in the way he writes about the black boy Brooks who is a deeply troubled youth, primarily because although he has money and comes from money and attends an exclusive prep school he can't walk down the street without being hassled by police and residents because he is black. Nor does Mr. Murphy give any indication that just because he has money he doesn't face horrendous prejudice within his fancy school where he is the only black boy. Just because his schoolmates and teachers don't use the 'n' word doesn't mean they aren't thinking it. Tolerance is hugely different from acceptance. Mr. Murphy gives absolutely no indication that he understands anything about racial prejudice and at times he appears in several situations when Brook has experienced racial prejudice to blame him, the 'victim', for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I don't know if Mr. Murphy intended the role reversal in the relationship of Eric and Brooks, with Eric playing the impossibly perfect Sidney Poitier of 'Guess Whose Coming to Dinner' and Brooks as the flawed rich/bad boy who learns wisdom from his more poor but worthy opponent/ultimate friend, to be at the forefront of readers minds. I don't think so, the novel isn't that good, but I rather think he did draw on these stereotypes - but then everyone and everything in the novel is a stereotype of one sort or another.
Bad novels are always easier to write about than good ones, 'Getting Off Clean' was bad in 1997 and it has only got worse as time has gone on.