I loved it for its objectivity and common sense regarding kids whose bad behavior is more extreme than average. But it doesn’t propose many solutions.
When kids are bad, people tend to blame the parents for being abusive, neglectful, unloving, or setting a bad example that the children imitate. But this was not true of most of the parents who came to the author (a clinical psychologist) for help with their children, and their other children turned out fine despite growing up in the same environment (ix, 7, 15, 19, 48, 103). “Many of these mothers and fathers have declared that they would make virtually any sacrifice to help their child become self-disciplined, constructive, and happy” (x). The parents feel a lot of guilt, and sometimes the children make them feel guilty on purpose in order to get away with more bad behavior (13). Antisocial teenagers/adults “blame their parents for their own behavior, no matter what the parental approach to child rearing was. If the parent was strict, he is accused of being overly punitive and harsh. If he was permissive, he is charged with having no backbone. If he was ‘democratic’ in his child-rearing practices, he is seen as indifferent” (194).
Parents can only do so much. Ultimately the child still has free will whether to make responsible choices (8). “The child is not a passive receptacle” (14). “The environment from which a person comes is less crucial than the choice the individual makes as he responds to that environment” (18). Temperament/personality is inborn (198). “Yes, certainly the offspring of inadequate, uncaring, and abusive parents are likely to suffer. But by no means does it follow that all will become criminals. . . . Many human beings will turn out well despite their parents, not because of them” (198).
Symptoms of the antisocial youth who tends to become an adult criminal:
Angry (41, 65), stubborn (48), mean (132), manipulative (172).
As babies, they may be restless, irritable, active, fitful, and won’t have much regard for others (138).
Early interest in sex or rape (60).
Finds being good to be boring (187, 188).
They get a thrill out of doing bad things and tricking people (13, 31, 72, 80, 196).
High self-esteem and confidence (28, 65, 69).
Sadistic and selfish; no empathy for others (51, 52, 116, 119).
Feels no remorse (32).
Seeks power (28) and attention (48).
Insists on having things his way (42).
Often lies, steals, vandalizes, and is violent (40, 60, 97).
Knows right from wrong but chooses to do wrong (30, 57, 95).
Wants to win at everything tried and will not bother otherwise (42, 67, 68, 76, 78, 203).
Won’t bother with anything that takes effort (77, 80, 81, 117).
Often they are very smart but may choose not to do schoolwork because it’s boring (73, 77).
If they do do well in school or work, it’s only a front to hide their bad behavior (31, 120, 121).
Pleasant and cooperative only if things are going their way (131).
May be very social but tries not to let anyone really know him (28, 112).
Uses people and isn’t loyal to anyone (29, 115, 117, 118).
“Ready to be the gallant knight to come to the rescue, the hero in any situation, but rarely is he willing to be encumbered by a relationship unless he can dictate the terms” (117).
Plans when it comes to getting away with bad behavior but doesn’t plan when it comes to responsible choices (30).
Blames anyone but himself for his problems/failures (29, 41, 58, 101, 120).
Denies or minimizes the seriousness of what s/he has done (96).
They often complain that their parents don’t trust them, but the lack of trust is only because the child has proven untrustworthy (16, 93, 154).
Symptoms can be seen as early as the pre-school years (13). You should be concerned if your child hasn’t stopped stealing by age six, or if your 6-12 year old steals every 3 or 4 months or more (126). “Aggression at age eight is the best predictor of aggression at age 19, irrespective of IQ, social class, or parents’ aggressiveness” (35).
Sounds like the ESTP personality. Of course, not every ESTP is going to be antisocial. Which is why things like kindness and self-esteem need to be part of a good typology system.
“There is no evidence that a learning disability drives people to commit crimes. . . . In most of the cases I have evaluated, no genuine learning disability is present. The youthful (or adult) offender is illiterate simply because he did not want to take the time and develop the patience necessary to concentrate on learning” (84). “I have seen innumerable cases where a child who does not want to do something is excused because he is thought to suffer from a handicap or condition that is not his fault. Many children who are antisocial have been misdiagnosed as hyperactive” (182). A kid doesn’t have AD(H)D if they’re able to focus on fun activities such as TV or games (182).
“The prevalent view is that people use illegal drugs to escape their problems, but I have interviewed dozens of individuals for whom things are going well. They have devoted families, remunerative jobs, good health, and plenty of leisure. These people turn to drugs because they do not accept life as it is” (85).
Solutions were few and far between, but here they are:
Keep a log/diary of your child’s behavior so that you don’t forget what they’ve done and can look back later to see if there has been a pattern of bad behavior (147)
Don’t give in to whatever your kid wants. Don’t make excuses for their bad behavior (130).
Set limits and punish (130).
Admonish in a low voice, with no emotion (133).
Be consistent, firm, strict, and loving (136, 146, 205).
Explore errors of thinking that give rise to irresponsible conduct; teach the child to deter criminal thinking (203).
Don’t give up on your child (158).
Have a structured home environment (204).
Both parents should work together and be on the same page with the plan (168).
You’ll get better results the earlier you start, but you trying is better than doing nothing at all (146).
Tell the child that “he has destroyed whatever trust existed. If necessary, [the parent] must review the litany of incidents that have eradicated the trust and not allow the child to pick apart and dispute each one. The parent must then indicate that with a trust rating of zero, the child will have to prove by his behavior that he deserves to be trusted again. Because the child has demonstrated his untrustworthiness, he is to be restricted and will have to EARN the easing of those restrictions over time. The parent must decide what restrictions are warranted and what privileges should be withdrawn. Parents should attempt to be explicit so as not to be vulnerable later to charges of being vague or arbitrary. Moreover, one-time follow-through is not, in and of itself, grounds for concluding that the child is now trustworthy. New PATTERNS must be established” (156).
When your child behaves better, express recognition and appreciation. Emphasize how the new behavior differs from the old pattern. Tell him you hope he’ll make a habit of the new behavior. In your own mind, be neither optimistic nor pessimistic (157).
Things that don’t work:
Providing more recreational facilities/activities. “Most of the delinquents whom I have interviewed during the last ten years had abundant recreational opportunities. But having these resources did not change what they sought from life or how they conducted themselves in the world” (189).
Giving the kid more freedom. “Parents who equate leniency with love often have unceasing difficulty controlling their children. Life holds consequences for irresponsible and destructive behavior. What could be more loving than to help a child learn this early, when penalties for misbehavior are far less severe than they will be later in life?” (146)
Permissive parenting can make some kids spoiled and difficult, others insecure and feeling unloved, but not every child raised permissively turned out antisocial (136). “Permissiveness does not ‘cause’ antisocial behavior. Different children make difference choices in reaction to whatever the environment is. I recall once visiting a relatively permissive open classroom setting where children were independently involved in a variety of individual and group activities, while the teacher worked with one cluster of pupils. Some youngsters were self-disciplined and focussed intently on the task at hand. When they completed one assignment, they went on to the next and did not appear distracted by the noise and bustle around them. A few children left their seats and for no evident reason, agitated classmates, wandered into the halls, and engaged in horseplay until a teacher reprimanded them. Such exploitation of freedom by the antisocial child is in stark contrast to the responsible use of freedom by most children. Although permissiveness may occur as a result of indifference or neglect, more often it results from a parent’s misjudging the maturity or character of his child. Precisely because the parent believes that his offspring should learn to become responsible for his own behavior, he grants him more freedom than the child is prepared to handle” (139-140). “Some children seem to be responsible no matter how little their parents are involved in their lives. The antisocial youngster’s personality is such that his parents hav eto be in close touch with his activities virtually all the time. He prefers that they stay out of his life, but that is all the more reason that the parent must remain involved” (142).
Juvenile hall. Putting kids into juvenile correctional facilities has little impact on them (12). Placing them in a school for bad behaving kids only gives the children more peers like themselves to get into trouble with (168).
When adult inmates were asked to brainstorm responses to improving schools to eliminate delinquency and crime, their answers included: more field trips, more fun, less competition, let kids teach and have autonomy and design their own classrooms, let kids win at what they do, let kids come when they want, redefine delinquency, and don’t teach kids (83). Funny because a lot of this criminal wishlist has been implemented into modern schools and is advised in books like “Discipline Options” by Richardson. But it sure hasn’t reduced crime! Positive discipline books say to not discipline your kids, otherwise they won’t develop self-discipline. This book says the opposite: The child “who receives little discipline may find it difficult to become self-disciplined” (139). “I have known parents whom counselors accused of being too restrictive, of not ‘letting go’ so that their child could achieve independence commensurate with his age. When the parents had followed the suggestion to loosen the reins, the child became embroiled in more trouble” (184). On the first day of school, a nine-year-old boy decided his teacher was soft and predicted to his mom that lots of kids would get away with lots of stuff. This boy stole more than usual from his classmates and from the teacher too (95).
I only disagreed with the author on one thing:
The author thinks that the confidence and self-esteem antisocial kids feel is not real, because it isn’t based on real achievement. I disagree because I think how someone feels about themself is completely separate from what they can do. A great artist can feel that their art is worthless, and a bad artist can feel that their art is a masterpiece.