Well and of course, it quite naturally makes a lot of common sense for Clyde Robert Bulla to keep the text for his 1960 picture book A Tree is a Plant sufficiently simple for the so-called picture book crowd. However and unfortunately, both my adult self and in particular my inner child are finding Bulla’s tone of narrative voice problematically patronising and his featured printed words for A Tree is a Plant often if not even for the most part rather overly exaggerated in and with their simplicity. Because while in A Tree is a Plant Clyde Robert Bulla definitely provides a lot of potentially interesting and educational details on trees in general and on apple trees in particular, the fact remains that while I am reading through and looking at A Tree is a Plant, the way Bulla is textually presenting his information to and for his intended audience, this all feels (at least in my humble opinion) rather too simple and almost ridiculously so even for younger children.
And well, that Clyde Robert Bulla’s textual tone and style for A Tree is a Plant equally seems rather overtly for and to me as though he, as though Bulla is preaching at and talking down to both potential readers and listeners of A Tree is a Plant (and quite patronisingly I think), yes, this certainly and majorly rubs me the wrong proverbial way and has definitely also majorly lowered my reading pleasure and my star rating for A Tree is a Plant from three to now only two stars. So indeed, not even the fact that I do find Stacey Schuett’s accompanying illustrations for A Tree is a Plant nicely descriptive and delightfully old fashioned can and will change that I simply find Clyde Robert Bulla’s text as it is presented in A Tree is a Plant extremely disappointing (and also, even with Schuett’s artwork, if A Tree is a Plant is to be used with young children, it might need to be explained what the general dress code was in 1960, that girls and women were made to wear dresses and skirts and not pants, not slacks).