It's important to know going in that 500 Bracelets: An Inspiring Collection of Extraordinary Designs is not a DIY, instructional, tutorial, or even much of an aspir- or inspirational book. With one "bracelet" (and why I put bracelet in quotes will be explained in a moment) singly pictured per page in large-format, the only information given about each is the artist and title of the piece (if any); its dimensions, materials, and processes used (described in single words only); and the photo credit. Extremely rarely, a short artist statement about the piece is included, and they're each as art-speak word-salady as the next.
I've read many of Lark Books' other 500 < whatevers > titles, and this is the most esoterically conceptual of the lot: there are no "bracelets" in here that are more than one – or occasionally two – of the following: 1) attractive, 2) practical, 3) comfortable, and 4) not ridiculous. (Here's an example of my definition of ridiculous: Untitled, 2002 – an industrial-sized roll of packing tape, 26cm in diameter, pictured being worn on the forearm, with its material and creation process described as "Roll of adhesive tape; readymade".)
I'm not entirely sure who the intended audience was for this book, and I say this as a jewelry maker as well as a person who likes conceptual, abstract, and even outright weird art. As a jewelry-maker, any techniques I see on a piece and/or see listed in its description that might interest me are not described in enough (or any) detail to let me experiment with it in the way the artist did. I'm also not particularly inspired in an artistic way by anything here, because I make jewelry to be worn, not to be displayed in a modern art museum (as a few of the bracelets in this book actually are). As a consumer and collector of jewelry (which I also am!), given the problem of the four attributes mentioned above, there are no bracelets here that I would want to own or even wear. (And it's a good thing too, because the only information provided about each artist is their geographical location, listed alphabetically in an index in the back.)
On the positive side, the one-page statement by this collection's single juror is fascinating. I don't particularly appreciate or agree with her approach to selecting these 500 pieces (out of a pool of ~3000 submissions), and I especially did not think it worked very well for a book format (a fact she at least readily acknowledges herself). It is however an interesting read for jurors, judges, and curators of any form of art, detailing her entire thought process, what questions to ask, what considerations she prioritizes, etc.
As for others who might appreciate this book? Possibly metalsmiths, who can see here photos of many examples of very technical but innovative and unusual forging, fabricating, working, and finishing of precious metals. Fine jewelers who were traditionally trained and would like to see what kind of shenanigans they can get up to with decidedly non-traditional materials? Ummm… design students, maybe? Pretentious coffee table book collectors? Ya got me.
2 stars.