I hated this book and so did everyone in my seminar class, I'm pretty sure. I'm marking this as "read" but I think there may be one chapter I didn't read.
while this book actually does give a good run down of how to do good research, how to develop your theory, how to test your theory, how to avoid bias and so on, it is painfully dry. when assigned readings from G&B, it would take me forever to get through them because the content is like dissecting a skin cell. this book provided me with a few moments of intellectual meditation but also a few moments of me falling asleep on my couch while trying to finish a chapter.
another point for G&B--this isn't just a textbook that guides you through the research process and how to do it. rather, it is a critique of how to do scholarly pseudo-science that backs up it's conclusions with a survey of other research method publications. each chapter has its own set of footnotes as well.
I found it particularly difficult to digest this book when I hadn't really conducted research before. I mean, how am I supposed to grasp criticisms of research when I haven't TRULY done any PROFESSIONAL research? how am I supposed to understand critiques of Game of Thrones when I haven't even seen the show? anyway...perhaps if I reread (shudders) the book now, after lectures and practice trying to create survey questions (etc) I might get more out of G&B's book. I imagine I will also find this book useful later on in my graduate life.