The first half of this book deals with Eastern monastic practices, highlighting its strengths and perils. This section of the book is of interest primarily to academics who focus on monasticism. The second half of the book outlines St Gregory’s life, his conflict with Barlaam, and the resulting theology. The book concludes with a look at modern hesychasm in Russia.
Meyendorff notes that Palamas did not exactly oppose Aristotelianism, per se (thus blunting a common charge made by Catholic scholars, notably von Balthasar). He saw it as a useful system, provided that one did not get carried away into excesses with it.
I assume most readers are familiar with the details of Barlaam. Of importance is Barlaam’s actual theology. Barlaam, following a nominalistic agnosticism, thought that the monks were saying one could bodily see the divine essence. 1) Barlaam said that all knowledge is sense-perception. 2) God, being defined as a Platonic postulate, is beyond sense-perception. Therefore, any knowledge/communion with God can only come from “intermediaries” (102).
Palamas responds thusly:
He is going to say that we do have a direct experience with God but we do not know the “essence” of God. How can he say this? First, God is essentially apart from other creatures because he is “uncreated.” Therefore, when creatures participate in God, they participate in “uncreated life.” Still, this does not yet address Barlaam’s challenge. Palamas will thus say that revelation, participation, deification, is a free act (energy) of the living God (118-119).
Therefore, we see a distinction between the divine act of revelation and the unknowable essence. This does not introduce a fourth term in the Godhead since God in his simplicity is fully present both in the essence and the energy.
Conclusions and Implications of Palamism:
1. There is no autonomous reality between God and creatures because God himself, in his condescension, is that reality (122).
2. The victory of Palamism protected the East from the onslaught of the Renaissance (94).
3. Palamas reestablished the dignity of matter, since the body fully participates in the energies of God (108). A corollary of this is a revitalization in the sacraments, for the new life in Christ is present in the sacraments.
I close with a quote from Meyendorff,
A…decision was set before the Orthodox Church in the fourteenth century: a choice between a unitary (integral) concept of man based on the Bible, affirming the immediate efficacy of redemptive grace in every sphere of human activity, or the choice of an intellectualized spiritualism claiming independence for the human intellect…and denying that any real deification is possible here below. There is no doubt that the secularism of the modern age is the direct consequence of that second choice (171).