Fr Alphonso uses an existentialist lens to look at Ignatius, a medieval man. He had good intentions, but got many elements gravely wrong. The heart of the error is a fundamental misunderstanding of Principles and Foundations. Ignatius was very clear that the purpose of man's creation is to "praise, reference, and serve God our Lord." This is the meaning of our life. In contrast, existentialism argues that there is no predetermined meaning for life. An individual's moral responsibility (Fr Alphonso explicitly calls it existential responsibility) is to create their own meaning and purpose in life. For Fr Alphonso, this "personal meaning" is the person's unique vocation. In other words, if one cannot find their own unique vocation, their life is devoid of meaning.
This is a reductionist view of life. Vocation is an important aspect of our life, but it should not be the only element. One's reading, travels, even housework, are all meaningful aspects of our life. Finding God in all things precisely means finding, serving and praising God in all these activities. Importantly, many of us may have chosen the wrong vocation due to life's circumstances. One could have taken a priestly vow before they find the true love of their life. Or they are forced by their family to take a regular job when deep inside they aspire to be a Carmelite monk. Practically what we desire and what we can live out can be two different things. Are all these lives devoid of meaning? Of course not. Because it is God who gives meaning to our lives, not our vocations.
The same error led to his misunderstanding of Magis. "The Ignatian ‘greater’ and ’magis’ make no reference whatsoever to a quantitative element or factor: it has to do with the qualitative ‘uniqueness’ or ‘specificity’ of a particular person's response. (Alphonso, 45)" This statement is categorically false. Ignatius founded the Jesuit Order to save quantitatively more souls. Quantity is surely not the only criteria, but it is an important criteria when all else being equal. In an almost idolatry search for vocation, Fr Alphonso believes that Magis is a "direct reference" to personal vocation. This is a regrettable misplacement of ends and means: God is the end of our vocation, and vocation is only the means.
Fr Alphonso argues for a two-step process of discernment: one has to first make an election for a personal vocation; then because of this elected vocation, discernment in everyday decisions naturally becomes a quick and simple process. This view mixes up the traditional Electionist Model of the exercises and the modern Mystic Model, and unfortunately inherits the shortcomings of both models. What if a person is in a permanent state of life and needs no major life decisions immediately? What if they cannot get the mystic experience that everybody else seems to have? Under Fr Alphonso's framework, not only that the exercises are likely wasted, their very life may have been wasted as well.
Ontologically, Fr Alphonso almost assumes a "vocation union" (rather than a mystic union) as the fundamental genesis of God's voice. This theological error has many downstream consequences. For example, Fr Alphonso assumes a more radical Aschenbrenner-turn: he proclaims that the Examine of Conscience is not an exercise of “mere morality”. It is true that modern theologians want to focus on the Examine of Consciousness rather than Conscience, but outright denying the examine of one's moral self is not only wrong but also dangerous. The spiritual warfare since the beginning of time, the one that Ignatius fought as a soldier under the Standard of Jesus, would have been a waste.
Overall, Fr Alphonso adopts a cellphone model of God's call. There is nothing wrong with finding one's particular, specific, or unique call. It is an honorable quest. However, it is dangerous to elevate the existentialist quest to the very meaning of man's creation. The real meaning of life is nowhere as complicated as Fr Alphonso made it to be: it is simply to serve God's greater glory.