I first came across Fr. Seraphim Rose while reading 'Christ the Eternal Tao', a thoughtful and well-researched comparison of Christianity and Taoism by Fr. Rose's disciple, Hieromonk Damascene. Damascene portrays Fr. Rose as a profound spiritual teacher, one who not only studied Taoism but also helped translate the 'Daodejing' into English before converting to Orthodox Christianity, drawn by the striking parallels between the two belief systems.
Curious to learn more, I quickly discovered that Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future is Fr. Rose’s most famous work. The book's synopsis promised a broad exploration, delving into topics as diverse as UFOs, demons, globalism, and the New World Order, which intrigued me. However, I didn’t expect the same Fr. Rose, so respectful of Taoism in 'Christ the Eternal Tao', to dedicate his most well-known book to denouncing Eastern religions and the ecumenical movement.
Initially, I found it difficult to understand how anyone could oppose ecumenism—what could be wrong with a movement that promotes dialogue and understanding among Christian denominations? But as I progressed through the book, I began to appreciate Fr. Rose’s perspective when considered from the lens of an Orthodox Christian. If you sincerely believe in the doctrines of your faith, it becomes difficult to regard all religious paths as equally valid. Fr. Rose argues that, for someone with strong religious convictions, it’s hard to accept that people in other denominations or non-Christian faiths aren’t fundamentally mistaken. According to his view, those outside the Orthodox Church are either deceiving themselves or are misled by Satan. As Fr. Rose puts it, what better way for Satan to lead people astray than by enticing them with alternative spiritualities that offer false comfort?
This absolute certainty in one’s own beliefs is something I personally struggle with, which is why I remain agnostic. If all religions embraced Fr. Rose’s conclusion, the world would likely be an even more intolerant place. What struck me, however, is that Fr. Rose doesn’t make a concerted effort to justify why he believes Orthodox Christianity is the "one true" path to God. The book isn’t written to persuade those outside the Orthodox Church, but rather to protect those within it from what Fr. Rose sees as the dangers of religious tolerance.
Fr. Rose presents Orthodox Christianity as under siege from all directions, including from within, to the point of paranoia. He believes this assault is part of a larger, coordinated effort to establish a new global religion, rooted in occult teachings and paganism, with the Antichrist as its leader. While I don’t share Fr. Rose’s conspiratorial view of global trends, I can understand why someone deeply committed to Orthodox Christianity might resonate with his concerns. As a supporter of traditional values, I also share his skepticism of globalism and his sense that such values are increasingly under threat in today’s postmodern world. At times, Fr. Rose offers somewhat compelling examples to support his view that Orthodoxy is being undermined by ecumenical acceptance of foreign practices. I can see how devout Orthodox believers might feel the need to defend their faith against these trends.
That said, I remain unconvinced by Fr. Rose’s arguments against the ecumenical movement or his theory about a new religion poised to replace Christianity. The book, though thought-provoking, comes across as somewhat extreme and, at times, bonkers. Nonetheless, I found it an interesting read, though not one that changed my views or left me with a sense of conviction about its claims.