This was not a well-written book. It was poorly structured, and lacked a central thesis. It mainly seemed to be a collection of negative anecdotes about Sinn Féin without relevant historical context. You can tell it was written by a journalist; it read like a series of unconnected news articles.
The main thing that bothered me was the lack of an argument. What was Moore actually saying? She contradicted herself many times. One that particularly struck me was her constant mention that Sinn Féin need to own up to their past, that they need to take responsibility - yet when they did so through displays of republicanism (Mary Lou McDonald saying tiocfaidh ár lá, Martin McGuinness and other key members admitting IRA connections, etc.), she also viewed this as problematic. The lack of connection between chapters made it even harder to understand her viewpoint. She seemed to boil it down to Sinn Féin = shady, which I think is a little simplistic.
It can't be denied that the killing of civilians is morally wrong on all levels, and that many actions of the IRA during the Troubles led to horrible, unnecessary deaths. What Moore fails to point out, however, is that these civilian killings by the IRA were nothing compared to the civilian deaths caused by the loyalist paramilitaries and the British security forces. While 35% of deaths caused by republican paramilitaries were civilians, 85% of people killed by loyalist paramilitaries were civilians, and of those killed by the British security forces, the people that were appointed by the British government, 52% of the people that they killed were civilians. Obviously all of these deaths are wrong, tragic and unnecessary, but why does Moore ignore the shameful actions of the British government and its supporters that killed a far larger proportion of innocent people? This lack of relevant context about the actions of the IRA makes me question how much other context is lacking from the rest of the book.
I also did not like her use of emotive and leading language, which, combined with no context, can leave the reader with a very different impression that what the reality actually was. For example: "Members of the IRA were now politicians. Men who had left school with very little education, and who had no trade or career due to a life dedicated to violence, were now representing some of the most deprived areas in the UK.". Alternatively, this could be phrased as: "Freedom fighters now turned to politics to make a difference. Men who had left school without being afforded the same opportunities as the wealthy colonisers, who had dedicated their lives to achieving a fairer and more equal country for their children, were standing for office in their local area." Her way of phrasing this struck me as being ignorant of the circumstances of why these areas were deprived (and no, it wasn't Sinn Féin's fault).
Sinn Féin are certainly not a perfect party, but neither is this a perfectly fair book. Two stars because I did learn a few new things from it.