I mean, where do I start? The book is TERRIBLE. Yet why did I rate it Three Stars? Well, it easily falls into the "So Bad It's Good" territory. I'm pretty sure the ghost writer, since I'm not even sure the Situation is literate, must have known this would be an easy paycheck and tried to have fun with it.
I can almost picture the meetings leading up the publication of this. Did The Situation have editorial control? Did he do the hilariously terrible drawings himself or did he outsource it the ghost writer's child?
I'm not sure there's a book that I've read lately where I had to put it down and shake my head at how offensive it is. I mean, it's like a juvenile version of misogyny that you just want to say "Hey, that's not just offensive but do you REALLY believe this crap?" I think the last time I had to put a book down, sit there and feel weird reading it, and then pick it back up just to see how it ends was an Ayn Rand book.
Yet the difference is that this is basically something you can read on a twenty minute bus ride, as long as you don't mind people seeing you're reading The Situation's book, autographed nonetheless!
It's a stupid book. You'll forget about it until you see it on your shelf again. Then you'll pick it up, turn to a random page, and remember why it was stupid in the first place. Zero useful advice unless you act like Opposite George.
It was a gift. Why the hell not, you know?