I just finished reading Ruth's book and found some arguments on the social sanction of same-sex marriage to be super compelling. From the copious allusions to same sex affection and homoeroticity (Jai and Veeru in "Yeh Dosti" from "Sholay" in 1975) to the story of Bhagiratha being conceived from the union of two widows. Tales of how the sensuous language of Rekhti poetry was erased. Of how poetry, which often described the love of two female courtesans for each other, but often composed by men who also wove in female mennerisms in their performances, were subjected to a deliberate erasure of the "effete" post the defeat in the First War of Independence in 1857. Of how Madhubala in "Pyar Kiya To Darna Kya" in Mughal-e-Azam (1960) became a defining refrain in many queer circles, with the message of why there is no shame in love. While the book does focus a bit too much on relationships and togetherness as a proxy for alternate sexualities, I really enjoyed being re-introduced to a whole set of a rich tradition of being "open", and one that had much less room for labels, value judgements and boxing into categories!