I often wondered as a young officer how mid-level staffers received accounts of the events they witnessed from the periphery. If, for example, you were not at the big table (i.e., instead sitting in the seats along the walls) when LBJ’s cabinet met, what would the experience of reading H.R. McMaster’s “Dereliction of Duty” be like? Or if you were present when the RAF weather officer was updating Eisenhower on conditions for sailing across the Channel in early June 1944, what would you think of Michael Korda’s narrative in “Ike”. As one of those in the seats along the wall in the Close Air Support (CAS) community, I found a lot of great material in this book.
There are, for example, some great CAS war stories in “Danger Close”—my favorite being the dispatch of B-52s to a beleaguered SOF team near Konduz in Chapter 2 (Integrating the Team), a fine exhibit in making the case for the synergistic effects of putting USAF Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) personnel into special operations missions and the units performing them. Call writes that this phenomenon “was a melding together of two areas of American advantage—what Washington insiders would call ‘asymmetric strength’—and it drew on the inherent strengths of each while mutually masking disadvantages. Significantly, it was hammered out by practitioners in each field who were not only experts but also creative thinkers and who remained solely focused on drawing out the best capability to accomplish the mission.”
The book is not exactly kind to General Hagenbeck or his recollections (which he put in writing) on his interactions with the USAF CAS apparatus when he led Task Force Mountain in 2003 (full disclosure: I was part of Mountain’s Air Support Operations Center at Bagram). I believe, though, that there will be a perpetual discussion on the interservice tensions and intraservice command and control relationships (i.e., the Combined Air Operations Center located in Saudi Arabia), and I think the level of interest in Sean Naylor’s “Not a Good Day to Die” (which Call cites in the book) and the book on ANACONDA from Les Grau and Dodge Billingsley (which he does not) is a testament to that.
In contrast to this complicated situation at Bagram, though, Call implies in his chapter on the 2003 Iraq invasion that the ideal CAS relationship was shared with Major General Buford C. Blount’s staff at the 3rd ID. As 15th Air Support Operations Squadron commander Byron Risner recalls:
[Blount] basically came up to me and said, "Listen, I want you to brief the entire staff on lessons learned from Anaconda so we don’t repeat those same mistakes," which I thought was a large step forward for the army to come and ask me to do that… I think you’re seeing leadership in the Army from the two-star level… I [briefed the staff] and it was amazing how many folks really did not know the truth; a lot of myth passed around—"the air force is this," "the air force is that." But I basically took pieces of what Hagenbeck put in his article and countered them with the truth.
So “Danger Close” in the narrative about the pertinent developments encompassing ENDURING FREEDOM and IRAQI FREEDOM proposes an increasingly-improving relationship between a ground force needing fire support (and the Rumsfeld-Franks decision to deploy no organic artillery support to Afghanistan with the Task Forces is described in the book) and the USAF command and control apparatus that could live and fight alongside it to provide that support. His descriptions of the parochial hindrances to this ideal relationship are spot-on and his reporting on the leadership that leaned forward to overcome those roadblocks (e.g., both Blount and 18th Air Support Operations Group commander Colonel Mike Longoria) are nicely complemented by the first-person accounts of TACPs talking air-delivered munitions onto hostile targets under fire.
Part of that process is minimizing the possibility of fratricide, and these accidents are, in my experience, one of the aforementioned hindrances; the ground-based customer sometimes focuses on what Call refers to as “the lowest points”—one of which he describes in his prologue, the accident at Kuwait’s Udairi range that killed 6 and wounded 5 from the team controlling the strike. I personally think the book would have benefited from a couple of other CAS fratricide examples like World War II’s operation COBRA, or the JDAM that almost killed Hamid Karzai in the early days of ENDURING FREEDOM. I believe these events and the subsequent progress made in avoiding similar incidents as we move left on the timeline are essential to discussing CAS and its best practices in the Joint fight.
To tie the sack shut, I believe that this book does a fine job of handing off the “Inside Baseball” accounts of this combat enabler—from the NCOs and CGOs juggling a radio handset and an assault rifle under pressure to the senior decision-makers who had to bend some rules and sell the capability to their own superiors as U.S. forces moved downrange. I have recommended it not only to other USAF CAS alumni but to my friends in the SOF community as well.