Let's begin with a certain fact: a fully employed physicist would resist the claim that he or she was on the same level as Richard Feynman. My point is not to assess the qualifications of those working physicists who are helping us prepare for the end of the world. I wish them all the luck they need. What I am trying to do is determine what makes Feynman a recognizable figure beyond the limited range of professional physicists.
I think I have a right to do this because I don't believe the community of working physicists have been altogether forthcoming in the impact of their professional commitments. Besides that, I would not want to hear from them because the majority are far too boring.
Let's take up the case of Richard Feynman. If you know anything about Richard Feynman, you know he created his three volume set of lectures titled, "Feynman Lectures on Physics." It's good to think of this work. It's magnificent in the same way the Sistine Chapel is magnificent. But most people aren't willing to pay an entrance fee just to browse through the lectures.
Here I will quote Gloria Lubkin: "The diagram you see scattered throughout this issue is a reminder of the legacy of Richard Feynman left to us..." Physics Today, 1989. If we think of people only in terms of the consequences of their actions/performances/deeds/thoughts, then Feynman will be known as the creator of diagrams. These diagrams helped many to make the complex calculations required in particle physics to appear less complicated. You could say that Feynman was one of physics best rhetoricians: creating an audience beyond a narrow range of specialist knowledge.
The book under review attempts to give an account of this complex transaction between the physics community, the lay audience, and the creator himself. Happy reading.