THE MOST IMPORTANT HISTORICAL STUDY OF THE HOLOCAUST (IN A SHORTER VERSION)
Historian Raul Hilberg wrote in the Preface to this 1985 book, “The following pages contain a brief description of the destruction of the European Jews… The volume is designed for those who are not familiar with any details, but it is not an outline. All the contents have been taken from … a larger work… newly published in three volumes under the same title. These, then, are excerpts… tied together to form a smaller coherent whole.”
In Chapter 1, he states, “Since the fourth century after Christ there have been three anti-Jewish policies: conversion, expulsion, and annihilation… The Nazi destruction process … was the culmination of a cyclical trend. We have observed the trend in the three successive goals of anti-Jewish administrators. The missionaries of Christianity had said in effect: You have no right to live among us as Jews. The secular rulers who followed had proclaimed: You have no right to live among us. The Nazis at last decreed: You have no right to live.” (Pg. 7-8) He continues, “the anti-Jewish policies of conversion and expulsion … were also limits before which the bureaucracy had to stop… that is … why the German bureaucracy under Hitler did infinitely more damage in twelve years than the Catholic Church was capable of in twelve centuries.” (Pg. 13)
He notes, “racism acquired a ‘theoretical’ basis only in the 1880s. The racists of the nineteenth century stated explicitly that cultural characteristics … were the product of physical characteristics. Physical attributes did not change; hence social behavior patterns also had to be immutable. In the eyes of the anti-Semite, the Jews therefore became a ‘race.’” (Pg. 19)
He acknowledges, “The Jewish reactions to force have always been alleviation and compliance… This reaction pattern was born in the ghetto and it will die there… The alleviation-compliance response … has its beginnings with the Jewish philosophers … who bargained with the Romans on behalf of Jewry.. The Jewish policy .. assured to the embattled community a … chance for survival during the periods of expulsion and exclusion… the Jews have always played along with an attacker… in the knowledge that their policy would result in [the] least damage and least injury.” (Pg. 23)
He says of the April 7, 1933 Nazi Germany anti-Jewish decree, “There was [a] difficulty … [in] the substance of the measure. The term ‘non-Aryan’ had been defined in such a way as to include not only full Jews… persons with four Jewish grandparents---but also three-quarters Jews, half-Jews, and one-quarter Jews. Such a definition was considered necessary in order to eliminate from official positions all persons who might have been carriers of ‘Jewish influence’ even in the slightest degree.” (Pg. 28-29) He adds, “half-Jews were called ‘Mischlinge’… [P]ractice … split the non-Aryans into two groups: Mischlinge and Jews… subsequent measures were … taken only against ‘Jews.’” (Pg. 31-32) He summarizes, “in consecutive steps, the Jewish community was isolated socially, crowded into special houses, restricted in its movements, and exposed by a system of identification. This process… called ‘ghettoization,’ was completed with the institution of a Jewish administrative apparatus… it is essential to know the origins of the Jewish bureaucratic machine. The Jews created that machine themselves.” (Pg. 59)
He recounts, “When the German army moved into Poland in September 1939… the machinery of destruction in Poland overtook and outdid the bureaucracy in Berlin. There were three reasons for this development. One is… the German administration in Poland… [was] less ‘bureaucratic’ than the administration in the Reich. Another… reason … was the German conception of the … Polish Jew… The Germans referred to Eastern Jewry as ‘subhumanity’… the bureaucracy could be less considerate and more drastic… The third and most important reason was the weight of its numbers: Ten percent of the Polish population was Jewish… The uprooting and segregation of so many Jews posed altogether different problems.” (Pg. 64-65) Later, he explains, “The ghetto was a captive city-state in which territorial confinement was combined with absolute subjugation to German authority.” (Pg. 89)
He outlines, “When the bureaucracy had completed … their concentration in ghettos, it had reached a dividing line. Any further step would put an end to Jewish existence in Nazi Europe… the crossing of this threshold was referred to as ‘the final solution of the Jewish question… The aim … was to be death… The Jewish problem would never have to be solved again… The annihilation phase consisted of two major operations. The first was launched … with the invasion of the USSR. SS and Police were dispatched to Soviet territory, where they were to kill all Jewish inhabitants on the spot… a second operation was instituted … [in] which the Jewish population … were transported to camps equipped with gassing installations… The effort … was deemed necessary to accomplish the ‘Final Solution’ on a European-wide scale.” (Pg. 99) He adds, “Einsatzgruppen… were the first mobile killing units.” (Pg. 102) He continues, “the Einsatzgruppen moved closely on the heels of the advancing armies… The Einsatzgruppen had moved with such speed … that several hundred thousand Jews could be killed like sleeping flies.” (Pg. 107, 109) He recounts, “Across the whole occupied territory Jews were turning to the Christian population for assistance---in vain.” (Pg. 119) “The killers were well armed, they knew what to do and they worked swiftly. The victims were unarmed, bewildered, and followed orders.” (Pg. 126)
Himmler asked his chief of staff for “killing methods more humane than shooting… The eventual answer … was the gas van… There were many technical and psychological problems with the gas vans in the fields… Clearly, alcohol, speeches, and gas vans did not eliminate the psychological problems generated by the killings. Yet there was no breakdown in the operations as a whole.” (Pg. 138) He adds, “partial figures, aggregating more than 900,000, account for only about two thirds of the total number of Jewish victims in mobile operations.” (Pg. 153)
He recounts, “in 1939, Adolf Hitler uttered a threat of total annihilation in language far more explicit than… his predecessors: ‘… If international-finance Jewry … should succeed … in plunging nations into another world war, the consequence will be… the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.’” (Pg. 157) He continues, “Heydrich now took the next step, He instructed … Adolf Eichmann to draft an authorization what would allow him to proceed against Jewry on a European-wide basis…. The text was signed by Göring … With the receipt of this letter Heydrich held the reins of the destruction process in his hands.” (Pg. 163) Heydrich “sent invitations … for a ‘Final Solution’ conference… The meaning of ‘Final Solution’ had to be surmised.” (Pg. 165) He continues, “After the meeting… Gradually the news of the ‘Final Solution’ seeped through the ranks… Hitler himself addressed the German people … on September 30, 1942: ‘[After] my Reichstag speech…the Jews of Germany laughed about my prophecies… I can only repeat: they will stop laughing everywhere, and I shall be right also in the prophecy.’” (Pg. 168)
He asks, “What was the overall reaction of the Jews in the face of certain death? Did Jewry prepare for armed resistance?... The Jewish leadership in the Polish ghettos stood at the helm of the compliance movement, and ghetto chiefs were the implementors of the surrender.” (Pg. 196) But he adds, “The largest single clash between Jews and Germans occurred in the ghetto Warsaw. [But] for the further development of the destruction process, this armed encounter was without consequence.” (Pg. 199)
He explains, “The most secret operations of the destruction process were carried out in six camps located in Poland… The killing centers worked quickly and efficiently. A man would step off a train in the morning, and in the evening his corpse was burned and his clothes were packed away for shipment to Germany… The most striking fact about the killing center operations is that… they were unprecedented. Never before in history had people been killed on an assembly-line basis.” (Pg. 221) He continues, “The death camps operated with gas… [T]hought had been given in Germany… to the notion that life not worth living may be unworthy of life. This… was accomplished by representing retarded or malfunctioning persons … as sick or harmful cells in the healthy corpus of the nation… ‘Euthanasia’ was a conceptual … prefiguration of the ‘Final Solution’ in the death camps..” (Pg. 225-226) He goes on, “Zyklon was … manufactured … to exterminate rodents and insects in enclosed spaces… That it should now have become [used]… to kill off Jews by the hundreds of thousands is no mere accident. In German propaganda, Jews had frequently been portrayed as insects.” (Pg. 235)
He notes, “The success of the killing operations depended… upon the maintenance of secrecy… At no point would any disclosure be permitted; at no time could the camp management afford to be caught off guard. The killers had to conceal their work from every outsider, they had to mislead and fool the victims, and they had to erase all traces of the operation.” (Pg 238-240) He recounts, “Selections were undertaken… in order to pick out deportees who would be able to work, but also… to eliminate inmates too sick or too weak to work any longer… When the Auschwitz victims filed into the gas chamber, they discovered that the imitation showers did not work… An SS man … emptied one can after another into the gas chamber… the victims began to scream… Within fifteen minutes… everyone in the gas chamber was dead. The gas was allowed to escape… The Jewish work parties (Sonderkommandos), wearing gas masks, dragged out the bodies… and hosed down the dead… [which] were searched for hidden valuables, and gold teeth were extracted… The bodies would then be cremated.” (Pg. 247-249)
He states, “How did the German bureaucrat cope with his moral inhibitions? He did so in an inner struggle… Fundamentally, this arsenal of defenses consisted of two parts: a mechanism of repression and a system of rationalizations. First of all, the bureaucracy wanted to hide its deeds. It wanted to conceal the destructive process not only from all outsiders but also from the censuring gaze of its own conscience… Despite such attempts, the annihilation of the Jews was becoming an open secret… Thus, the first stage in the repression was to shut off the supply of information from all those who did not have to know it… The second stage was to make sure that whoever knew would participate… The third stage in the process of repression was the prohibition of criticism… In its fourth stage the repressive mechanism eliminated the destruction process as a subject of social conversation… The fifth and final stage in the process of repression was to omit mention of ‘killings’… even in the secret correspondence… The process of repression was continuous, but it was never completed.” (Pg. 278-282)
He goes on, “Psychological justification is called rationalization. The Germans employed two kinds of rationalization. The first was an attempt to justify the destruction process as a whole. It was designed to explain why the Jews had to be destroyed. The other explanations served only to justify individual participation in the destruction process---a signature on a piece of paper or the squeeze of a trigger.” (Pg. 283)
He explains, “over a period of centuries the Jews had learned that in order to survive they had to refrain from resistance. Time and again they were attacked… There were many casualties in these times … but always the Jewish community emerged once again…. The Jews had never really been annihilated… Only in 1942, 1943 and 1944 did the Jewish leadership realize that, unlike the pogroms of past centuries, the modern machinelike destruction process would engulf European Jewry. But the realization came too late. A 2000-year-old lesson could not be unlearned; the Jews could not make the switch. They were helpless.” (Pg. 300-301)
This book (even in this ‘Student Edition,’ for those of us who can’t afford the 3-volume edition) is absolute “must reading” for anyone studying the Holocaust, and its related topics.