Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Green Gables Letters: From L. M. Montgomery to Ephraim Weber, 1905-1909

Rate this book
An interesting sequence of letters, written by L.M. Montgomery early in the century, were found in 1956 among the papers of Ephraim Weber who was living in the West. Now lodged in the National Archives in Ottawa, the letters, reproduced here exactly as they were written, form a fascinating footnote to the history of Canadian letters.

These letters are of interest and importance not only because they were written during the years of gestation and birth and outstanding success of the book Anne of Green Gables, but also because they reveal a lively extrovert in an eminently healthy balance. This should prove an absorbing book, both to those adults who have nostalgic memories of "Anne," and to writers who need encouragement in their struggle for literary recognition.

114 pages, Paperback

First published June 1, 1981

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

L.M. Montgomery

1,815 books14k followers
Lucy Maud Montgomery was a Canadian author whose novels, stories, essays and poems made her one of the most widely read writers in Canadian literary history. Publishing under the name L. M. Montgomery, she achieved international recognition with the novel Anne of Green Gables, released in 1908, which quickly became a bestseller and introduced readers to the imaginative orphan Anne Shirley. The success of the book transformed Montgomery from a schoolteacher and magazine contributor into a celebrated literary figure whose work reached audiences far beyond Canada. Raised on Prince Edward Island, she drew deeply on its landscapes, rural communities, and storytelling traditions, turning the island into the setting for many of her novels. The popularity of Anne of Green Gables led to numerous sequels, including Anne of Avonlea and Anne of the Island, establishing a beloved series that followed Anne from childhood to adulthood. Montgomery continued to write steadily throughout her life, producing twenty novels and more than a thousand short stories poems and essays. Her fiction often centered on young women, personal growth, and the emotional ties between people and place, combining gentle humor with reflections on memory, imagination, and belonging. Although she enjoyed enormous popularity, Montgomery also faced personal difficulties, including long periods of depression and the strain of caring for her husband, a Presbyterian minister who struggled with mental illness. Writing became both a profession and a refuge, allowing her to transform memories of childhood and observation of everyday life into vivid storytelling. In addition to the Anne series, she created other notable works, including the Emily novels and several stand alone stories that explored identity, creativity, and attachment to home. Her books were translated widely and attracted devoted readers around the world, helping shape the international image of Prince Edward Island as a place of pastoral beauty and warm community life. Scholars later studied her extensive journals letters and manuscripts, which revealed the complex inner life behind the cheerful tone of many of her books. By the time of her death in 1942, Montgomery had become one of the most successful and influential authors in Canadian literature. Her stories about imagination, resilience, and the search for belonging continue to inspire readers of all ages, and Anne Shirley remains one of the most recognizable characters in children's fiction. Through generations of readers, Montgomery's work has encouraged appreciation for storytelling, nature, and the emotional richness of ordinary life. Her legacy also includes a vast body of diaries and correspondence that document the challenges faced by a professional woman writer in the early twentieth century. Institutions such as the L.M. Montgomery Institute have continued to examine her influence on literature culture and tourism, particularly on Prince Edward Island, where sites associated with her fiction attract visitors from many countries. Adaptations of Anne of Green Gables for film, television, and theatre have introduced new audiences to her stories, ensuring that her characters remain part of global popular culture. Though critical opinion once dismissed her as merely a writer for children, later scholarship recognized the depth of her themes and the enduring craft of her storytelling. Today she is remembered as a central figure in Canadian literature whose imaginative vision gave voice to the beauty of rural life while celebrating the hopes of young dreamers who search for belonging.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
35 (53%)
4 stars
14 (21%)
3 stars
9 (13%)
2 stars
4 (6%)
1 star
3 (4%)
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews
322 reviews
June 5, 2015
As a lifelong Anne devotee, all I wanted and expected from this book was an insight into one of my favorite authors while she was writing some of my favorite books. I was delighted with Montgomery's voice, and it was a pleasure to get to be a voyeur on her communications with a friend. The letters follow the time from when Montgomery was a struggling author receiving rejections and small fees for poems and stories published in various magazines, to the publication of Anne and its successor, all the way to the "pestering" of her devoted fans.

All this I expected, but what I didn't expect were the discussions of:

theology,
As for the Bible, the same limitations must apply to it. You know to be frank, I do not look upon the Bible as a book inspired by God. I look upon it as a book much of which is inspired with God--a collection of the myths, history, poetry, ethics, and philosophy of a singularly spiritual (taking into account the period in which they lived) people whose superior conception of the Great Intelligence fitted them to be the mouthpieces of that Intelligence.


mortality,
What a strange thing this death is. We all know we are going to die sometime but the knowledge never worries us or clouds our happiness here, as a general thing. Theologians have done much to surround death with horror and dread. If we listened to Nature's teachings we should be happier truly believing (I hold) that death is simply a falling asleep, probably with awakening to some happy and useful existence, at the worst an endless and dreamless repose.


what Montgomery had been reading lately,
Have you ever read Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde by Stevenson. It is well worth reading and enforces a strong lesson. If it ever comes your way read it.


writing advice,
There is no power that so speedily rusts as that of expression. So to work at once, stick to it, write something every day, even if you burn it up after writing it. Otherwise you'll atrophy to a certainty.


and suffragism,
As for "spheres," I believe anyone's sphere--whether man or woman--is where they can be happiest and do the best work. The majority of women are happiest and best placed at home, just as the majority of men are in the world. But there are exceptions to both. Some women are born for a public career, just as some men are born to cook in a restaurant. Yes, they are! And each has a right to fulfil the purpose of their birth. Sex seems to me to enter very little into the question.


This left me not only hungry for more of Montgomery's letters (thanks Amazon one-click!), but also longing for a time of letter writing and the slow reflection required to achieve it. I'm envious of it and nostalgic for it. Anyone need a pen pal?
Profile Image for Chautona Havig.
Author 281 books1,877 followers
Read
January 31, 2025
I don't know how to rate this, so... weird. I think I'm leaving the stars out of the equation. How do you give points or subtract points for someone's correspondence?

"I give her a five for interest but a two for consistency?" Come on...

On the other hand, I suspect I would remove a star if I were certain that all of Weber's letters were available to show the entire correspondence. Enough was that we got bits and pieces, so...? IF that were possible, I would consider it foolish not to show both sides of the thing. I also suspect that Montgomery would agree.

Still, it was a delight to see just how much of Anne was in those letters--even when she became "stale" (totally burned out!) as Anne did. I think her criticisms of Anne come because of seeing her own (sometimes perceived) faults in the girl. Just like parents are often hardest on the child who reminds them of themselves most.
Profile Image for Lorna.
114 reviews
September 20, 2022
I'm a fan of the Anne of Green Gables books and love L.M. Montgomery's writing, but this collection of personal letters between her and a fellow Canadian, Ephraim Weber, didn't capture me. I realize it's sometimes best to just enjoy literature for its own sake rather than delving into the personal lives of those who create it.
Profile Image for Orinoco Womble (tidy bag and all).
2,360 reviews242 followers
December 13, 2016

Oh, dear.

The more I know of LM Montgomery the person, the less she appeals to me. I came to her books comparatively late, and while I did find "Anne" a bit gushing and starry-eyed, most of her fiction is OK. I was curious to listen in on her letters to a friend/fan.

I know Montgomery had a history of depression, but that's OK, so do I. However, she goes from gushing over Nature like Anne Shirley in her worst moments, to waspishly biting the character that feeds her (to mix a metaphor). Most of the letters reproduced here are full of the fact that yes, she writes for the money, and is mostly interested in her "juvenalia" for the money it will bring in. By the end of writing Anne of Avonlea (title chosen by the publisher) she is so "horribly tired of that detestable Anne that I could wish in all truth and candour that I had never written her." Which doesn't stop her gleefully telling her correspondent the exact amount that the first year's royalties came to--and then in a PS asking him not to divulge it to anyone else!

Reading some of the now out-of-print short stories in Chronicles of Avonlea and Further Chronicles of Avonlea, I remember being startled to discover just what a nasty little snob and racist Montgomery could be, particularly toward French Canadians and Indians, but not excluding anyone who isn't PLU, culturally or intellectually. This is borne out by her attitude toward the girls in her real-life Sunday School class, whom she finds "stupid and unimaginative." There's worse to come. At that time, the position of Sunday School teacher was sometimes paid, just as choir soloists and organists were paid. Maybe that was the attraction for Montgomery, who rejects all idea of the divinity of Christ, writes of God in the past tense (!) and refers to the idea of being cleansed of sin by the blood of Christ as "hideous cant": "To me, that phrase always summons up a disgusting physical picture that revolts me!" She can spiritualise Nature and gleefully embrace superstition, thought transference and "mental healing", but not blood redemption! She claims in the letters to have "discovered the Bible" in about 1906, and to have begun "really reading it", but apparently her mental filter blocked out the message. She finds the Israelites interesting, but is more interested in phrases from the KJV that passed into common language than anything else.

Montgomery apparently dedicated Anne of Avonlea "to kindred spirits" precisely because she abominated fanmail from grateful readers who felt themselves to be soul-sisters of Anne Shirley, and wished she'd never mentioned them. Don't worry, Miss Montgomery, I never thought of you as a kindred spirit--and now I know you never could be.
Profile Image for Brits.
75 reviews
February 7, 2025
It was interesting reading l.m. Montgomery's letters. I'm a huge fan of her books and her letters were quite interesting as well. It was interesting to me that she didn't think the story of Anne was good enough to sell and was quite amazed that it did and how well it did! Then her publisher asked her to write a sequel which she did but she did not like it. She for sure thought it wasn't as good as the first. And she writes about how sick and tired she is of Anne. Brighter winter 2025
38 reviews1 follower
December 1, 2025
I loved reading these letters so much. I had just finished rereading The Blue Castle and it was wonderful to gain more of an insight to her as a person. Reading them felt like travelling back in time and becoming part of her eveyday day life and when the letter collection finished it was like “oh no! I want to know more!” I love the way she writes, and found it fascinating reading about her religious opinions. Would highly recommend to anyone who enjoys her work
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Profile Image for Rebecca.
Author 5 books94 followers
June 7, 2025
Lovely. They had a beautiful friendship. The introduction, transitions, and the epilogue by the editor, Wilfrid Eggleston—a pupil and mentee of Weber's—were very touching and provided additional context that really helped showcase these letters.
Profile Image for Sheryl Sato.
Author 2 books4 followers
October 1, 2019
A fascinating look at L.M. Montgomery's views on religion, life after death and the Anne series.
Profile Image for grace.
111 reviews
June 8, 2020
making a point this summer to learn more about lucy maud <3
Profile Image for Martyn.
541 reviews18 followers
December 8, 2015
In 1960, when it was first published, it would have been quite fresh and insightful to read when there was such a dearth of printed material available regarding the life of Montgomery. But today when we have such a wealth of published resources available to us, in the Journals, letters to Macmillan, and biographies, it loses something of its value. It's a long time since I read the letters to George Boyd Macmillan so I am not sure how they compare or contrast with this collection to Ephraim Weber. The letters are thoroughly readable, but perhaps have little to add to what we can learn elsewhere.

My main grumble, if I have any, is the general price of the book. The second edition (1981) contains 114 pages, of which 38 are taken up with preface, introduction and epilogue by the editor - much of which felt very repetitive, and much of which has been superseded by all the information subsequently made available to us. Only 72 pages consist of the actual letters of Montgomery to Weber - about fifteen letters in total. It would have been straightforward enough to combine these letters with those contained in the sequel (After Green Gables) so that all the letters were together in one volume, instead of publishing this slim volume separately. Or alternative, all of Weber's letters to Montgomery could have been included, to show more fully the exchange of dialogue between the two. The editor of this first volume does a good job of providing a summary of some of the important elements of Weber's letters, to help put Montgomery's responses into context, but if the original letters exist, why not include them in full? [20 Dec 2015: Having read the sequel, I discover that all of Weber's original letters to Montgomery were subsequently lost - which makes it even more sad that they weren't published while it was still possible.)

The prices of the two volumes of letters to Weber suggest that they are intended more for libraries and academic research than for the general public. The cost will be prohibitive to many would-be buyers, and I think they would be right to be cautious. The first volume of the Selected Journals provides much better value for money than this first volume of letters, and is far more insightful into what was going on in Montgomery's life at that time - and is told more honestly too.

Though she valued this correspondence so highly, to me it feels like it was for mere fun and refreshment. It feels quite shallow and superficial, never deep, never truly personal. She didn't really speak openly or honestly about anything going on in her life from an emotional perspective. She just enjoyed the chance of being able to voice opinions which she couldn't say to those closer to home where she had to keep up the appearances. It's obvious from reading her Journals that she wasn't a Christian. Here in the letters it comes across in a more concise manner as she openly speaks to Weber about all the essential elements of Christianity which she didn't believe and detested. As an expression of the direction churches were drifting in, she is probably fairly representative, and not as unique and thoughtful as she would have liked to have believed herself to be.

She regarded Weber as a kindred spirit, but as I view it, the friendship was rather shallow, (in so far as it can be read out of these letters at any rate). Maybe in her imagination Montgomery simply attached to it more importance than the correspondence in itself was truly worth - it was representative to her of friendships which she could never find in real life - she could imagine him to be a kindred spirit because she rarely saw him, where she might have grown disillusioned with him had they met on a regular basis. Habit and nostalgia, clinging on to remnants of her past and a need for some constants in her life, might also explain why she attributed so much importance to the correspondence. To my mind these letters don't actually express anything of a true 'kindred spirit'.
Profile Image for Emily Kidd.
399 reviews
February 5, 2014
It has a sad tone to it - I think that is the part in where they search for truth and hash out Christianity, but never find it - and yet it also is a reflection of youth and the path toward success and life fulfillment. I am glad I read this, not just the letters but the preface and epilogue. I want to read their later letters too. I found out I have another thing in common with L. M. Montgomery - favorite flower. I wish I could have met her. This book was we'll put together and I am glad I read it, but I cannot help but turning over the last page and feeling sad and taking on the emptiness they never struggled out of.
Profile Image for Maria Elmvang.
Author 2 books108 followers
July 3, 2007
I bought this at a time where I wanted to read everything and anything concerning L.M. Montgomery - especially as Ephraim Weber got mentioned quite a bit in her journals. However, having read the journals, there was very little new in this book, although it was interesting to see how she described her reactions to the publishing of the two first Anne books to somebody else (and that Mark Twain wrote her a review!). Also, I had forgotten how quickly she was pushed to write more - "Anne of Green Gables" was initially supposed to be a stand-alone novel!
Profile Image for Sarah.
253 reviews12 followers
September 22, 2013
This may rank as the most delightful read of the year. Every page offered gems of beauty, humor and intellectual strength.
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews