Once you start reading this, it becomes clear that the intent of this book is to introduce the ideas of a "classical" education to parents considering home schooling for their children. The book is clearly written, moves along well, and does provide some distinct ideas for what to do if home schooling is chosen. I have little doubt that, if followed through, this book can contribute to a successful home schooling experience. The author, who is an active blogger on these topics, has successfully presented what she set out to present.
So why did I say this was only "ok"?
The problem was that I had higher expectations when I bought the book. I had read about it in some review that linked it together with some additional works on the role of classics in education, mostly about the continuing rationale for an undergraduate program. Well, when I got around to this book after reading the others, such as by Martha Nussbaum, it did not stand up well in comparison.
To start with, the idea of "classical education" here is ambivalent. On the one hand, there is homage to the three part medieval curriculum of grammar, logic, and rhetoric. But, then in practice, these become three general approaches to learning basic subjects : 1) learn the foundational elements and components of an area and the basic rules of order (and repeat them a lot to burn them into memory); 2) learn the logics of manipulation and practice them a lot - learn to write sentences and paragraphs (and to rewrite the paragraphs of the greats); 3)finally, learn to present what you have learned to others, with style and effectiveness - ah... Cicero! These ideas are all well and good and I do not wish to argue against many of the points that Bortins raises. On occasion, I used them in helping my four children - now all largely grown -- to read more and think more critically. The problem is that this sort of "classical" education is different from the original medieval model, in ways too difficult to go into here. Along with this basic ambivalence, references to other versions of "classical" education come up as well. Bible study is mentioned liberally. Colleges that offer a "great books" curriculum - St. John's, for example -- are also featured. Again, these are fine, but to throw these models into the mix together as "clasical" without trying to clarify the differences is not in my opinion very effective.
There is a more troubling contradiction here. The motivation for home schooling, although never entirely clear, has much to do with the perceived (and often very real) failings of public "specialized" approaches to primary education. This approach is supposed to reintroduce and reinforce rigor and thoroughness in education that will over time lead to better prepared students. But throughout the book, Bortins is playing the cheerleader to parents interested in doing this. So, a real question is what type of an education to the parents need to make this work? If parents were brought up in a limited non-classical environment, if they have not read the great books, if they do not know Greek, Latin, or other more modern languages, then how can they effectively teach their children? Bortins seems to suggest that parents should just do their best, learn while they do this job, and not worry, since everything will work out given sufficient effort and proper motivation. But isn't that the same criticism that is often directed at public schools -- under educated and under prepared teachers who have not mastered the very subjects they are trying to teach? Why can this be surmounted by home schooling? If "classical" learning is really a lifelong pursuit, then can it really be picked up on the fly? Bortins is silent on this contradiction.
Another problem I had was that the book discusses forms and processes and steps to take, but talks very little about the actual content ideas. To put it bluntly, this does not read like a book written by a classically educated thinker/writer. I was interested to know what she thought a difficult philosophical problem was - at one point she was happy that one of her sons had picked up and started a philosophy book during their regular home reading times. Well, what book was it? What did he think of it? What did Bortins do/say to guide her pupil in working through difficult issues or resolve difficult issues such as arise in classic philosophy texts?
The author is careful not to be on the wrong side of the PC police and delicate topics are not gone into -- race, sex, family stability, values as an aid to personsl decisions, etc. You know, just the topics that are important in raising young students. I understand the need to be careful.
Net net, I expected much more from this. Much of the material was on the order of "God, mother, and country" agreeable at general level with all the difficult issues left to the details. That is not helpful. I realize that she wasn't trying to do this, but that is why the book was only "OK" for me.