I was excited to pick this book up at AWP, because I had read an enthusiastic review of it in the Time Out Chicago, the author is a Chicagoan who teaches at Northwestern, and I kept seeing nice reviews or mentions of the book online.
For all of those reasons, this is a book I really wanted to get behind (no pun intended, haha), but I just can’t do it. This is not a good book.
I’m going to focus on the second story in this collection, HOW TO MARRY A WASP, which focuses on the impending wedding/commitment ceremony of two gay men, a latino from a poor immigrant family, and a wasp from a rich family.
This immediately raises a few red flags for me. Don’t worry, I’m not squeamish, but Frangello is a white woman, so why write a story about two gay men? And it gets a little worse than that. A lot of the story is about, for lack of better phrasing, “the Latino experience in Chicago”. I live in Chicago, and race here is a complicated thing. Maybe Frangello lives in one of the gentrified or rapidly gentrifying areas along the Blue Line, and thinks she knows something about the Latino experience because of this? But she doesn’t. It’s offensive. She continually uses the terms “spic” and “wetback”, which is one of many, many things in this story that have little purpose other than shock value. The problem with using the word spic is that it’s too easy. It’s offensive, but somehow safe, especially when the POV character is using it to reference himself. Why not just write a story about black characters and use the N-word? Now that would make us REALLY uncomfortable, but it wouldn’t quite be safe.
And the sex stuff. Again, you get the feeling that Frangello thinks she is being edgy, or naughty, but there’s nothing close to groundbreaking here. Nothing here gives you the skin-crawling discomfort you feel when reading the best Mary Gaitskill, for example (speaking of Gaitskill, I was also bothered by the fact that this book looks like a bad imitation of Gaitskill's BAD BEHAVIOR, from the coloring and style of the cover, to the feel of the book, to the font choice throughout). There are a few reasons for this. One is that Frangello doesn’t employ simile or metaphor, which can be powerful in deviant sex scenes. Another is that there are no deviant sex scenes, in this story or in others in the collection. There is a date rape in one story, which is kind of in scene ("he entered me"), but come on. We are told of anal sex, endless blow jobs, characters who love to be tied up, abusive relationships, countless rapes, etc. etc., but I can’t think of a single instance in which one of these acts occurs, in the scene, with a POV character looking out who we can relate to.
Also, I’m sorry to say that Frangello doesn’t have very powerful sense of description. In a pay-off scene in this story, we watch a middle aged trophy wife urinate herself in an expensive dress. I can’t still can’t picture that little scene, not where the woman was standing, what she looked like, what she looked like while peeing herself, what her dress looked like, nothing. A good chunk of this story happened in the Uptown Theater, on Chicago’s north side. Uptown is a great place to set a story. Maybe the best neighborhood in Chicago to embody rugged beauty and mild sense of danger, too. And the Uptown theater itself is one of the few undeniably cool buildings in the city. And the story relies on the description. And it would be very, very cool to get an inside look at the theater. But she just doesn’t nail it. Just a few generic wedding descriptions, and we are left to fill in the blanks on our own.
Another problem is that there is way, way, WAY too much exposition, not just in HOW TO MARRY A WASP, but in every story in this collection. Do we really need to hear about the narrator’s abusive father? Isn’t this a cliché, even in this story? Do we need to know every character’s history? Frangello trusts that her edginess or naughtiness, or whatever you want to call it, will be enough to keep a reader engaged, but it isn’t. I need a scene that I can get lost in, or at least a character I care about. Or if the experience is going be about being uncomfortable, then I need to be really uncomfortable, and not just annoyed.
All of that said, I have to admit that HOW TO MARRY A WASP got me. The story pulls a surprise ending by turning an assumption we have made on its head. And Frangello pulls it off skillfully. It’s a very emotionally resonant moment. It’s telling though that the moment in question relies on character rather than situation or subject matter, which so little else in this book seems to. Based on that story, I might have given this collection a 3 or 4 star ranking, but the next story WHAT YOU SEE, brought me too my senses. That story should basically not exist. I think Frangello has good moments as a writer, and I’d like to see her working with subject matter that’s less constrictive.
I am going to post a review of Gaitskill’s Bad Behavior today also, because I pulled that book off the shelf while reading this one.