Ancient civilisations exercise an intense fascination for people the world over. This Handbook provides a vivid, scholarly, and eminently readable account of ancient cultures around the world, from China to India, the Middle East, Egypt, Europe, and the Americas. It examines the development of religious belief from the time of the Palaeolithic cave paintings to the Aztecs and Incas. Covering the whole of society not just the elite, the Handbook outlines the history of the different societies so that their religion and culture can be understood in context. Each chapter includes discussion of the broad field of relevant studies alerting the reader to wider debates on each subject. An international team of scholars convey their own deep enthusiasm for their subject and provide a unique study of both popular and 'official' religion in the ancient world.
This was a really good overview of the world’s most ancient religions. The only gripe I have is that the chapter on Ancient Israel is definitely on the liberal side, which is fair I guess since it is the current majority position in scholarship. The bigger offense is I felt like some of the more liberal positions were built on some pretty big assumptions. Here is one example from the book:
“In the book of Amos the Israelites are criticized because they offer sacrifices at Bethel and Gilgal but oppress the poor (Amos 4:1–5). The accusation that their sacrifices are insincere is a powerful one; but Amos could have brought a more powerful argument – that Moses had explicitly forbidden any sacrifices except at the single sanctuary (which was Jerusalem in Amos’ time). The reason why Amos did not use this argument is that he was not familiar with a law of a central sanctuary, not out of ignorance, but because no such law existed in his day (the second half of the eighth century BCE).”
This matter-of-factly stated line of reasoning seems to only hold up if one is willing to use quite a big argument from silence while also assuming that Amos (or the God of Amos) may not have simply been more concerned with the oppression of the poor than with the place of worship. The context of the passage also reads nothing like an endorsement of sacrifice in these places. I would say the main value in this particular chapter is in seeing the opinion of current critical scholarship on ancient Israel while also showing some of the weaknesses in its assumptions.
A fascinating book that invites us to travel throughout Antiquity and discover the architecture of the belief system that mankind has trodden. It's a long journey, as old as the history of mankind itself, which surprises us when turning a page with parallels between religions where we least expect it. The book is extensive and even so, it ends with the feeling that much remains to be revealed.
I didn't read all of this collection of essays on the various religions of the ancient world--just the ones that appealed to me. It's a survey, to be sure, but an interesting one, covering a wide range of civilizations. One or more chapters ought then to appeal to almost anyone interested in comparative religion or the ancient world.
A fascinating read, and good reference for anyone wanting to learn about ancient religions. Even for the ones I'm well versed in (Greece, Rome, Egypt), I learned something new.