From a master teacher, a results-oriented approach to powerful legal writing that communicates, that persuades--and that wins.
Of all the professions, the law has the most deserved reputation for opaque, jargon-clogged writing. Legal education, which focuses on judicial opinions, not instruments of persuasion, is partly to blame. Yet forceful writing is one of the most potent weapons of legal advocacy. In Writing to Win , Steve Stark, a former teacher of writing at Harvard Law, who has taught thousands of aspiring and practicing lawyers, has written the only book on the market that applies the universal principles of vigorous prose to the job of making a case--and winning it.
Writing to Win focuses on the writing of lawyers, not judges, and includes dozens of examples of effective (and ineffective) real-life writing--as well as models drawn from advertising, journalism, and fiction. It deals with the problems lawyers face in writing, from organization to strengthening and editing prose; teaches ways of improving arguments; addresses litigation and technical writing in all its forms; and covers the writing attorneys must perform in their practice, from memos and letters to briefs and contracts. Each chapter opens with a succinct set of rules for easy reference.
No other legal writing book on the market is as practical, as focused on results, as well written as Writing to Win .
Steven D. Stark, a former world sports columnist for the Montreal Gazette and the author of four books and one e-book, has been a commentator for CNN, National Public Radio, and the Voice of America, where his role was to try to interpret American culture to the rest of the world. He has written frequently for the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Atlantic Monthly, and the Boston Globe where he was an op-ed columnist."
Read an excerpt from this and really liked it. Useful and well-written.
"The law is one of the principle literary professions. One might hazard the supposition that the average lawyer in the course of a lifetime does more writing than a novelist."
Interesting read and informational. I found out a lot about the English language, writing technics, and again adjectives and adverbs in the expression of drafting and writings.
I resumed reading this book. I found myself outlining what he was saying. The choices of words are intriguing. Lots of examples are vivid and fun. It's incredibly inspiring, as a lawyer is confused by the legalese daily. It has inspired me to be brave enough to stick to my ordinary senses.
Thank you!
One thing, though, is that parts of quotes introduced by the author make me feel disoriented because I do not know why they are there.
Halfway through this book I decided it was the best book on legal writing I've ever read. This was the 2000 edition; there's a 2012 edition I'm trying to get my hands on.
This book contains great advice for legal writers. It has assured me that my chosen profession will allow me to utilize the skills that I have acquired since I started studying writing.