First introducing the concept of high tech/high touch in his bestselling "Megatrends", Naisbitt now sharpens his focus on the one great megatrend of the new millennium: the impact of technology--genetic technology being the most influential of all--on society, our culture, our personal lives, and the lives of our children.
After serving in the U.S. Marine Corps and after finishing his studies in at Utah, Cornell and Harvard, he worked as an executive in the coporate world, was called to be Assistant Secretary of Education under President Kennedy when he was 34, and worked as Special Assistant for President Johnson. He has witnessed America going throubled times and good times. He has traveled the world since the late 1960s, keeping in close touch with corporations and people in many fields of endeavor. He has spoken to virtually every major corporation, to many several times. His cultural life and residence in the United States, Europe and now China keeps him in direct in touch with a changing economic environment -- experience that is reflected in the books he has written.
His international bestseller Megatrends sold more than 9 million copies and was on the New York Times bestsellerlist for more than two years, mostly as number one. John Naisbitt published the international bestsellers Re-inventing the Corporation in 1985, Megatrends 2000 in 1990, which was published in 32 countries and was the Number One bestseller in the U.S., Japan, and Germany, and Megatrends for Women in 1992 (co-authored with Patricia Aburdene). His Japanese language book, Japan's Identity Crisis, was released in 1992 and was a bestseller in Japan.
His 1994 book, Global Paradox, received England's World Review Award for The Best Book of The Year. Megatrends Asia 1995, was a bestseller in the German language and in Asia. High Tech High Touch, was published in the fall of 1999 and has since been published in 17 countries. His last book Mind Set! was published in 42 countries. The Wall Street Journal called his work “triumphantly useful…taking bearings in all directions and giving us the courage to do the same.”
* Studied at Harvard, Cornell and Utah Universities * Former executive with IBM and Eastman Kodak * Assistant Secretary of Education to President Kennedy * Special Assistant to President Johnson * Former visiting fellow at Harvard University, visiting professor at Moscow State University, and current faculty member at the * Nanjing University in China * Distinguished International Fellow, Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS), Malaysia -- the first non-Asian to hold this appointment * Recipient of 15 honorary doctorates in the humanities, technology and science Source: His Official Web page
Liked the book and suggestions, oddly enough this was recommended by a friend who talks the talk but does not walk the walk. The tips are only good if you actually do them.
185 pages of unadulterated techno-pessimism lamenting how techology is ruining the world. Of course dated by now, and without providing any solutions short of throwing away all your tech and going living in a cabin in the woods. The redeeming feature that saves this diatribe from one star is the last chapter on how modern artworks use and comment on technology. The interesting concept of high tech/high touch was apparently exhausted in Naisbitt's "Megatrends." Not recommended.
buku ini meceritakan tentang kemajuan teknologi khususnya IT yang mempengaruhi sosial budaya di Amerika. Naisbit menyatakan ada korelasi antara film-film kekerasan dan game yang berbau kekerasan terhadap serangkaian tragedi pembunuhan massal oleh anak2 dan orang dewasa di Amerika. bisa jadi tragedi virginia tech yang lalu juga ada kaitan dengan uraian nasibit ini. Naisbit menggugat industri televisi bertanggung jawab terhadap kerusakan moral yang cenderung pada kekerasan. di Indonesia sendiri gejala tersebut ada. mungkin kita tinggal menunggu rentetan tragedi saja :(. atau sudah sering terjadi?
This book is terrible. I strongly recommend against reading it. I was unable to get through the whole book.
The work is disorganized, written in a random organization. It doesn't make clear what its points are. It makes various aggrandized claims of problems with limited evidence, and even less explanations what to change.
The book includes lots of anecdotes from a range of people. It fails to clearly tie them to a narrative, to put them into context. Even the good anecdotes are often put into a context that implies they are very scary without any justification.
When I was fed up I tried to skip to the end to find conclusions, but those that exist are spread out and hard to find.