Extremely mixed thoughts about this book. This book is split into two parts, and the first part really worked for me. The second part, maybe the last third of the book, was deeply disappointing to me.
Let’s start with the good. Lojman is a book about a family trapped in a snowstorm in a Turkish village. A mother, Selma, gives birth to a baby, and her husband has stormed off after a fight leaving her alone with her other children, Görkem and Murat. Selma is deeply troubled, and appears to suffer from manic phases that prevent her from caring from her new, unnamed baby, or cooking for her other kids. She hates her children, and her children hate her. In their isolation, the author probes the extreme points of longing, loathing, jealousy, and desire. A blurb favorably compared the book to Elena Ferrante’s Neapolitan novels, which I can see, but the book’s apocalyptic and claustrophobic isolation was closer to the feeling of Krasznahorkai, and for film heads, the violence and strangeness occasionally felt like Harmony Korine’s Gummo.
One of the most powerful narrative techniques that really made this part of the book special was how details were omitted to us as readers. The narration primarily focuses on the perspective of Selma and her aggressive daughter Görkem, and only veers into their perspectives when they are experiencing anger. Selma experiences manic bouts of ecstasy, where her paralytic depression gives way to painting her face, dancing around the house, and reciting poetry to herself. We only access this side of her from Görkem’s perspective, who watches with rage while yearning for her attention. When the reader returns to Selma’s perspective, she is back in the well of her sadness and apathy.
In an especially moving and horrifying scene, Görkem, who wants to experience the feeling of motherhood, maims a mallard outside and takes it to her mother for attention. She is infuriated to find that she is taking care of the bird better than any of the children, including her newborn baby. Out of spite, she murders the bird while remaining attached to its corpse. It’s quite horrific, but I found the extreme violence plausible after all of the work that had been written beforehand.
Normally I’m not a fan of books focused on cruelty or hatred, but for me, it worked. Care and effort had gone in to crafting the details of the little house, and I was really impressed.
Until I wasn’t.
In the second half of the book, a dramatic, surreal twist occurs out of nowhere when the entire home that they are in is encased in goo. There were no signs or foreshadowing that something like this would happen, and all of the characters are locked in the substance, able only to stare at each other and wait for their death. The baby, malnourished, begins consuming the goo, growing ever larger as the family looks on in horror.
I’m a fan of the movie Eraserhead, and I’m not opposed to domestic surreal horror as a genre. But this second part of the book was so left-field, so unexpected, that it completely ruined my experience of reading the book. Thematically, it kind of works? Something about unfulfilled desire and being trapped? But it also felt obvious as a metaphor. I was far more frustrated by the novel that had seemingly been abandoned to make this ending happen.
What made this book so interesting was how the characters interacted with each other, and the plot device goo suspends them in isolation. It felt to me like the author was struggling to wind all of the impending doom into a conclusion, and the publisher was like “tick tock, give us the draft of your manuscript.” Maybe the author was mirroring the style of my least favorite Russian author Vladimir Sorokin? I can come up with justifications for this all day, but the point is that the way this book ended didn’t feel planned or intentional.
I was unbelievably frustrated by this book, and went to bed angry afterwards.