The Science of Mechanics

by ernst-mach, Amit Hagar (Introduction), Thomas J. McCormack (Translator)

This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ The Science Of Mechanics: A Critical And Historical Account Of Its Development 4 Ernst Mach Open Court, 1919 Mechanics

Genres: Science, Physics, Philosophy, History, Nonfiction, Mathematics, History Of Science

605 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1883

Reviews

[Douglas · Rating 5 out of 5]

Ok physics buffs! This is a hard book, kinda like physics bootcamp. But you'll be better for it--especially the young 'uns. I slugged it out with it under professorial supervision when I was an undergraduate over 30 years ago. Not that I was all that good a physics student, doing well on examinations and churning out reams of completed problem sets. Frankly, that was quite boring and I wonder that anyone could really love physics after several years of such drudgery. Perhaps that is why Americans have shied away from the subject in recent decades? Perhaps it is also the reason those nations whose ancient ancestors' success was determined by difficult imperial examinations are not currently dominant in the field now? If Americans ever want to apply their native inventiveness and regain lost ground in physics, this is the book to start with. But find someone to read it with for maximum benefit.

[Andrew Noselli · Rating 3 out of 5]

From my rather shallow and, I admit, not very facile mathematically, understanding of the history of science, as related this treatise of Ernst Mach's which dated from 1905, I understand that time as a unit of experimental measurement was introduced by Galileo, who first postulated the acceleration of bodies and extemporized the laws of motion which were based on his observations. In the next stage, it was Sir Isaac Newton who used time to extrapolate his scientific philosophy, setting down the laws of gravity which were to extend even to the celestial bodies in the heavens. Newton would proceed to lay down the laws of thermodynamics, which stipulated that the motion of gases could not be determined by the classical laws of mechanics but were determined on the basis of their specific heat. Although Mach's book was published the same year as Einstein's "miracle year" of 1905, it would fall to Albert's special theory of relativity, which came out in 1915, in which he would elucidate the relationship between energy, time and mass - a theory which would puzzle scientists and laymen alike for one hundred years - this relationship that was not static as according to mechanical principles, either, but was as fluid and dynamic at the speed of light, insofar as time and light could be said to blur their properties into a shared status where they were no longer separate phenomena that could be perceived by an observer. Three stars.

[Michal Paszkiewicz · Rating 3 out of 5]

An interesting read that exposes how Mach changed his book 'Mechanics'. All of the modifications and additions are interesting and expose a lot of thought added to the project.

The edition of the book isn't particularly nice. I wouldn't have minded the photocopied pages so much if the blurb didn't claim it had no photocopies.

[Ami Iida · Rating 4 out of 5]

it is written about power .