Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Pauli and Jung: The Meeting of Two Great Minds

Rate this book
Foreword Magazine's Book-of-the-Year Award winner interprets the letters betweek depth psychologist C.G. Jung and Nobel Prize physicist Wolfgang Pauli.

313 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2004

14 people are currently reading
151 people want to read

About the author

David Lindorff

2 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
17 (48%)
4 stars
11 (31%)
3 stars
5 (14%)
2 stars
1 (2%)
1 star
1 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
Profile Image for Frater.
126 reviews33 followers
September 24, 2011
Amazing look at the common ground between Physics and Analytical Psychology and the advancement of both disciplines in the pursuit of understanding the material reality and the psyche of man. Pauli and Jung both worked together to prove that man and reality, both inner and outer, are very much connected and should be considered linked by middle ground. This marriage views helped strengthen both men's views on life and the lessons we learn along our collective journey. Truly an amazing book.
Profile Image for Sean Reeves.
139 reviews18 followers
January 4, 2021
The book throws an interesting light on how these two famous figures viewed the world in which they lived. However, I found the sections relating to Pauli's dream analysis to be quite tedious but that's not a criticism of the book. Others may find them interesting.
Profile Image for Alecsandra Litu.
21 reviews18 followers
June 17, 2020
Probably the most interesting read of the year, so far. Two fascinating minds, talking about complex topics (from quantum physics to the collective unconscious) and sharing insights about dreams. What's not to love? I must admit, there are several pages marked as "don't understand a word yet - need to come back to. But that's part of the fun, right? :)))
Profile Image for Alexandre Teles.
15 reviews3 followers
May 4, 2017
A great history about the friendship of this two genius. A boundary about the limits of physic and psychology very well described in the physic-psycological issue. The book goes deeper in the Pauli's mind, dreams and the relationship of his psychological life with his scientific discoveries. The book is hard and not friendly for a pure scientific person, it's about transcend the science to see the effort of Jung to make his theories with a scientific basement with support of Pauli. One more time here it shows how the second war affects their lives too and how the science changes the perspective to focused in practical use for destruction.
Profile Image for Craig Werner.
Author 16 books218 followers
November 21, 2025
Read this as a follow up to Atom and Archetype, the collection of letters between the Nobel laureate physicist and the pioneering analytical psychologist. You could read it before the letters and have a deeper sense of the context, but I think I'm glad I got the raw material first. There's some solid biographical background, but the core is in the way Lindorff (a Jungian analyst) works with Pauli's dreams. I picked up some things of use in my own work, most important involving the way that people from our "real lives" serve symbolic functions in our dreams. Mostly for those who are already involved in the conversations, but not a bad introduction.
13 reviews1 follower
June 6, 2025
not the easiest book to read. learning about their relationship and history was nice. the author was very speculative and non compelling.
Profile Image for Patrick.
865 reviews25 followers
June 18, 2009
I had really high hopes for this book, being interested in both the title characters and very intrigued by the potential cross-over between physics and psychology. The early chapters on Pauli were generally good, although once we get into his own fascination with his dreams and their significance it began to pale. The chapters on Jung and his desire to pursue Pauli seemed kind of pathetic. I am still curious whether there is something genuinely interesting in their exchanges that just does not come through Lindorff's didactic and amateurish writing, or whether these two were just a bit whacked in their mutual obsession, and we should politely concentrate on their more substantive contributions to their respective fields. I guess I'll have to find other sources to answer my question, because this book made me too crazy to read to the end.
Profile Image for Beth.
18 reviews1 follower
Currently reading
July 17, 2010
This book has been on hold for awhile. It is insanely good, but rather intense.
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.