This monograph for general audience best congeals Patricia Ebrey’s effort to bring women into the discussion of social history of Song China (976-1279). Despite the lack of Song sources by the women, Ebrey is able to glean almost all available Song sources about women such as legal cases, funerary biographies, medicinal literature, paintings, poems, marriage proposal, philosophical writings, etc. Based on critical readings of these collected material, Ebrey, for the first time, brings to us a plausible and synthetic account of Song women, the social contexts of their lives primarily through the lens of marriage, and how they negotiated within the system, participated with the social trends, and acted upon opportunities in the time of drastic social changes like the development of printing and market economy and cultural changes like Sinification of Buddhism and the revival of Confucianism. More importantly, by bringing women into the picture, as Ebrey has demonstrated, one is encouraged to not only ask new questions about kinship, economy, and culture but also provoked to engage with more elusive issues like “sexuality, jealousy, and gender symbolism” in the future research (p. xiv).
Ebrey organizes this monograph thematically with the first chapter “Separating the Sexes” successfully tackles the dominant Song gender symbolism of women in the inner quarters and men out fighting in the world. Marriage is the central lens in her investigation of the inner quarters and women’s lives. Focusing on marriage allows Ebrey to achieve at least two things. First, it allows her to get away as much as possible the patriarchal gaze and to bring women’s perspective into the picture. Second, using marriage as a “cultural framework encompassing a variety of partly contradictory and often ambiguous ideas and images” Ebrey is able to highlight the opportunities of agency for women to participate, negotiate, and build a more satisfying life (p. 8). In so doing, family becomes a social context where people, especially women as wives, concubines, mothers, and in-laws, “negotiated their relations with one another, often pursuing different interests and thus coming into conflict” (p.9). Following this novel research methodology, Ebrey provides plausible arguments for women’s active participation (if not bringing out change themselves) in the turn to uxorilocal marriages, the increasing size of dowries, as well as the spread of foot-binding as a pursuit for beauty and competition with concubines and courtesans.
Motherhood and widowhood were the two areas that best manifest women as actors instead of objects to be acted upon. Despite the dangers and difficulties associated with pregnancy, childbirth, and childrearing, because of the Chinese emphasis on family values that celebrates motherhood, women were able to gain satisfaction through educating and bringing up their children with relatively less ambivalence than other female roles. Widowhood, on the other hand, was plagued by structural vulnerabilities due to the lack of a male protector. However, the absence of men also brought about opportunities for widows to choose to remain celibate, continue the family line through adoption, engage more with family business, lead their families into prosperities, and retain control of their dowries—activities and decisions they had to make largely by themselves drawing supports and ideas from existing social norms and precedents.
Even though Ebrey’s monograph is geared toward a general audience, many of the issues she touches upon provide good incentives for further research. For example, in her discussion of upper-class wives in chapter six and widowhood in chapter ten, she mentions the close affinity of women with Buddhism and their frequent interactions with nuns and eminent monks. Though she never mentions this explicitly, one is left to wonder whether upper-class wives played an important role in the Sinification of Buddhism, especially the rise of Nan Chan (Southern Chan) in Southern Song through their sponsorship. Even though we may not have historical access to many of the women’s stories, Ebrey’s monograph not only discredits the flat image of deferral women in Song China but also represents a new trend to engage with both women’s studies and Chinese culture as a whole.