I'm very much split on my opinions of this particular book. On the one hand it is clearly a very well researched narrative of the Nazi regime's hate for all things Jewish, its motivations, its propaganda, its skewed world view and its deliberate actions to pull the wool over the eyes of its own people. However, the book also strikes me as being incredibly one sided. Herf makes almost no acknowledgement of the other victims of the Holocaust, be they gypsies, POWs, political prisoners, or disabled Germans. His sole focus is on the anti-Semitic attacks of the Nazi controlled press. While this is clearly in line with his thesis, it strikes be as being imprudent to overlook the universal suffering that was taking place. Additionally he makes statements that he does not seem to be able to back up, or waits until much later in the book to provide tangible evidence for. Very early in the book he criticizes Soviet forces for not launching air raids on the death camps as soon as they came into range. He does not however immediately prove that the Soviets knew the location of these facilities, or what exactly was occurring at them. Nor does he take into account the larger scale military strategy consequences that attacking these facilities from the air would have had. True, air raids may have destroyed the facilities, but they certainly would not have prevented the Nazis from using other methods to commit mass murder, but instead would have likely provoked a violent reaction against the inhabitants of the facilities.
Herf is also unduly critical of the German people in their acceptance of the party line. He rails against the German people for not seeing through the Nazi lies about the Holocaust, arguing that they should have picked up on statements from men such as Hitler and Goebbels, saying that the Jewry needed to be liquidated or exterminated. Herf fails to make the case that the average German would have been able to grasp the horrors of these statements when they were constantly being fed the anti-Jewish propaganda that Herf himself is attempting to analyse. This, to me, shows a lack of understanding of the psychological effect that propaganda has on its recipient, especially when the state exerts such a masterful level of control over the media that the public is exposed to.
Finally, I found at times that Herf was extremely repetitive in his book, sometimes using the same quotation multiple times in the span of a few pages. This to me is the action of someone who is trying too hard to make a point. His repativity is also shown in his focus on the Jewish fixation of the book. There exists pages in this text in which the word Jew, or some derivative of the word are used in excess of a dozen times. If I had a dollar for every time he used the words Jew, Jewry, or Jewishness than I'd be a very wealthy person.
Despite the glaring issues that I have with this book, it is, in its core, a good source of understanding Nazi propaganda and analysis of the anti-Semitic views of Germany, and to an extent, the wider western world at the time.