The Great Pyramid Decoded by Peter Lemesurier

by Peter Lemesurier

Understand the Complexity of the World's Greatest Monument Standing sentinel for four and a half millennia, the Great Pyramid of Giza has fascinated all who have beheld its imposing and elegant mass. In The Great Pyramid Decoded, historical theorist, researcher, and best-selling author Peter Lemesurier shares observations based on a simple numeric code which reveals illuminating perspectives on the past as well as prophetic visions of the future. Does the Great Pyramid hearken back to another civilization much older than ancient Egypt? Is it the Old Testament writ in stone? Is it an ancient observatory? A treasure house? A tomb? Is there a message in the geometric ratios? Lemesurier carefully explores these theories and draws some enlightening and meaningful conclusions. Translating the wisdom of this ancient monument, the author presents recommendations for the future which are consistent with the advice of Saint Malachy, Nostradamus, and Edgar Cayce, among others. Making connections to several religious traditions, Lemesurier uses the Great Pyramid to illustrate humankind's place in the universe. Read what this archaic wonder of the world has to say about where we came from and where we may be heading. Learn how this one ancient wonder can teach us that we have the potential to reawaken to an enlightened path forward. A must for anyone interested in the mystical wisdom of one of the most magnificent civil engineering feats of all time. This book is also available from Echo Point Books in hardcover (ISBN 635619882).

Genres: History, Nonfiction, Egypt, Egyptology, Ancient History

418 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1977

About the author

Peter Lemesurier is a professional translator and former Cambridge linguist.

Reviews

[Smiley McGrouchpants Jr. · Rating 4 out of 5]

A whole field (and fields) of study based on, by Lemesurier, to write on (like the shoulders of giants) and forge this book . . . only to be forgotten, and mocked by Umberto Eco in his Foucault's Pendulum.

What gives?

Referring to all these scholars and explorers-cum-ethnographers in this 197 work, the authors stands alone years ago by my reckoning into taking all seriously and aspiring towards some integration . . . of what? Mostly that the Pyramid (using technology that defied the grasp of most of those around to know what it was) was "written" in the "language" of mathematics (stay with me now . . . ) to serve as, among other things, a warning-and-reinforcer of those values and Eternal Truths.

The idea that they were tombs was a Christian projection — haughty and condescending at that.

Any book that ends with that Arthur C. Clark quote ("Third Law: Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic") can't be all bad (or at least senseless).

[Bethany · Rating 2 out of 5]

Peter can do geometry. But he also does bias. He is stuck in looking at this from the lens of modern Christianity. He tries to break out of it, but he doesn’t get there. He should instead be looking at the pyramid code through the eyes of times it was designed and built. It’s a little too convenient how “well” his Christianity based theories match the story of the pyramid. I think it’s a safer bet to assume that Christianity was designed to match the pyramid, than the pyramid predicted Christianity. Just saying.

I need some recommendations for non western pyramid theories. Like Kurdistan or India or hell, I’d take a Russian one. Get some diversity up in here.

Oh and according to this dude, enlightenment to come in 2279. Second messiah coming 2034/2039, departs 2116. Third arrives in 2134 and departs 2238. New physical existence 2264. Another messiah (brace yourself, 5th one is the charm. Blah blah blah, see page 118. Good luck in 3000 Nostradamus. Halloween 2033/2034 will tell.

Honestly, logically, the pyramid was probably telling the story of the people who built it, not predicting the future. Bite Pete thinks history will repeat itself every 26,000 years- so he may not be wrong. But god I wish I could get in there to see it for myself. Just speaks to my soul.

[Jordan · Rating 3 out of 5]

fun read

[Dave Cotton · Rating 1 out of 5]

Mathematical equations based on Christian theological assumptions? No thank you! No thank you very, very much!

[Carl Holmes · Rating 5 out of 5]

Interesting Esoteria. Seems hard to follow the heiroglyphs, but he sums up after each reading quite well. Leads you to make some interesting interpretations which are either brilliant, or pathetic depending on how open minded you are to the thinking.

[Pramod]

ok