حقوق جدید که بیش از حد مشغول فراهم آوردن مشخصهای مدنی برای مالکیت و تضمین حق مالکان است، فراموش میکند که برخی از مصادیق مالکیت از لحاظ سرشت آنها به هیچ وجه نمیتوانند ویژگی یک مالکیت خصوصی از پیش مشخص را تحصیل کنند و به واسطه ماهیت ابتدایی و موجودیت تصادفی آنها به حق تصرف مربوط میشوند. در نتیجه این مصادیق به حق تصرف طبقهای مربوط است که از حق هر نوع مالکیت دیگر مستثنی میشود و در جامعه مدنی همان وضعیتی را دارد که در طبیعت از آن برخوردار است. به بیانی دیگر، حقوق جدید در پی برچیدن حق فسخناپذیر فقرا از اموال عمومی عرضه شده از سوی طبیعت است.
Daniel Bensaïd was a philosopher and a leader of the Trotskyist movement in France. He became a leading figure in the student revolt of 1968, while studying at the University of Paris X: Nanterre.
Frankly speaking, personally, I bought this book by mistake instead of property less belong to Ursula Le Guin. It is very interesting compilation regarding the ownership and including Karl Marx philosophy. The book starts the first socialism ides belong to Max. It is not bad book
The low rating given (generally i love Bensaïd) is entirely because the book was not what I expected and I feel was narrower in scope then billed. The focus on intellectual property and the internet I felt was less relevant and less interesting than what I hoped the book would deliver on. The uniqueness of providing a “new notion” of the “dispossession of the poor” didn’t hit for me.
To me a super interesting intro to Marx’s writing, learned a lot about, even about little things (sorry I’ve never heard of rhineland before)
I’ve heard some critiques on bensaid’s examples of patents/ip, water, genomes, etc. and it seems like this is a hot take but I think he was ahead of his time these have all aged violently since he wrote this
Interesting critique of capital and the processes of commodifying goods through the lens of wood. Going to think about this every time I pick up a stick now.
Kendi çıkarına olduğu zaman bir balta ile testereyi ayıracak olan keskin zeka, başkasının çıkarı söz konusu olduğunda ince dallarla yeşil odun arasındaki ayrımı ihmal eder diyor ve dünyaca ünlü mülksüzler kitabı ile aynı ismi kullanıyor👎🏻çevirmen bir satır Almanca'nın çevirisini sayfa sonunda vermiş👎🏻çevirmenin etkisinin ne kadar önemli olduğunu gösteren kötü çeviri örneği