The Episcopal Diocese of New York invited Rev. Carter Heyward to lecture on this book. From there, several of us selected it to do a book study. I am grateful that we did this because these ideas have helped me understand and speak out as we witness what is happening in our democracy. So much hate speech, division, and violence is being done in the name of Jesus. Rev. Carter's book helps me understand how this has happened.
She outlines seven sins and gives background for each:
The First Sin - The Lust for Omnipotence
The Second Sin - Entitlement
The Third Sin - White Supremacy
The Fourth Sin - Misogyny
The Fifth Sin - Capitalist Spirituality
The Sixth Sin - Domination of the Earth and Its Creatures
The Seventh Sin - Violence
Rev. Carter is clear that it has taken us decades to get here. Even centuries. Thankfully, she offers ways to recognize these sins and start on a healing path.
Here are some of the ideas and passages that I noted.
"Arguably the most consequential example of this effort over the past two centuries of American history was the expansionist movement that flew under the banner of Manifest Destiny. John L. O'Sullivan, editor and Democratic politician, coined the term in 1845, proclaiming America's 'manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of Liberty and federal self-govermment entrusted to us.'"
"As for America, our chosen leaders, regardless of party, declare this country to be the world's premier nation, exceptional in almost every respect."
"Some are empirically true—America is the richest and most militarized nation on Earth, and America produces some of the best scholars, scientists, writers, artists, and athletes in the world. But neither America nor any country on the planet is best at everything. I doubt that many other nations—except today maybe Russia and China—spend much time worrying about it, at least not since the era of colonialism and imperialism. Yet being best and only has been an obsession among American political and military leaders since the end of the Second World War. Regardless of political party, American leaders have boasted about our country needing always to be regarded by Americans and others as the strongest, most righteous, and most enviable nation on the planet. Those Americans who have proposed that we regard ourselves as one among many excellent nations have risked being caricatured as unpatriotic."
"A radical ambivalence toward women and gays as well as a hatred of independent, self-defined women has been a driving force in Christianity from early in its male-dominated history, although probably not from its origins at a devoted band of friends and followers of Jesus of Nazareth. A strong case has been made by Christian scholars over the past fifty years that women were present alongside Jesus from the very beginning, but that these women were either erased entirely from the New Testament record or have been interpreted by Christian men through the lenses of misogyny: For example, Mary of Nazareth, Jesus's mother, has been lifted up, especially in Roman Catholicism, as the prototype of ideal womanhood, existing only as an impossibility: a nonsexual child bearer. By contrast, Jesus's good friend Many Magdalene has been represented as a whore a prototype for a bad woman."
"Throughout her career, one of her academic and educational passions was economic ethics increasingly in her later years, what she would name 'capitalist spirituality.' Due to physical challenges and diminished energy, Harrison was unable to pursue this topic in her waning years with as much vigor as she had wished, but she talked about it with friends and colleagues right up to the time of her unexpected death."
"Harrison was clear that for much of the past two hundred years, Protestant Christianity in America had aligned itself with capitalism, to the moral discredit of both. As both Protestant Christianity and capitalism had grown stronger in American life during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, each had contributed to the other's loss of any meaningful moral compass. In their shared fixation on the economic advancement and spiritual salvation of the individual (white male) as central to the American way of life, both American capitalism and Protestant Christianity had lost sight of the common good: the betterment of the whole society, not just its upper tiers; the advocacy of liberty and justice for all people, not just some; and a strong, shared concem for the well-being of the earth as a mutual partner, not primarily an object of economic exploitation."
"Harrison laid the responsibility for these failures squarely on the shoulders of both advanced global capitalism, especially its neoclassical foundations and Protestant Christianity, especially its idolatry of the individual white male."
"Is violence against evildoers ever justified? Under what circumstances, if any, might it be? This is a question that might move Christians to consider the life, circumstances, and final choices of the renowned German Protestant leologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a lover of humanity and a teacher of God's peace, who participated in a failed plot to assassinate Hitler, and who was hanged in 1945 for his crime against the Fuhrer. Was Bonhoeffer right or wrong? What do you think? Having wrestled with the question of Black self-defense as justifiable violence throughout his ministry, Martin Luther ing Jr. warned in his final book that "the line of demarcation between defensive violence and aggressive violence is very thin. The minute a program of violence is enunciated, even for self-defense, the atmosphere is filled with talk of violence."
"Paul Washington and Charles Willie were feisty, outspoken Black leader-participants in the Philadelphia ordination of eleven white women priests in 1974. Their liberation ethics required them to stretch the boundaries of justice-ministry into the realm of gender. Barbara C. Harris and Pauli Murray were pioneering Black women whose tenacious spirits led them not only to be ordained in the Episcopal Church but, moreover, into lifetime advocacy for justice in all forms. Over time, I would come to realize that, through the witness of such Black women and men, the Blackness of God had been luring me, encouraging and empowering me to come along for many years."
"To repent the sin of white supremacy is essential, because if honest our repentance signals a taking of responsibility for helping shape the future."
"In fact, repentance is a key to a just and compassionate future. And honest repentance will lead to conversion, a turning around to go the other way. It means not getting stuck, bogged down in guilt or shame, but rather encouraging one another to do the next right thing to work and struggle for liberty and justice for all, not just some. That is what Jesus means when he says to those who are immobilized by guilt, shame, confusion, despair, or any form of inaction, get up and move on. We cannot, in good faith, stay stuck, resigned to the status quo or willing to let others do the right thing while we stand on the sidelines and quietly applaud. We, all of us, must take up our mats, and walk."
"This will take us and our churches to any number of possible social justice endeavors in realms of health care, mental health, addiction, immigration reform and refugee support, criminal justice reform (including law enforce-ment, prisons, rehabilitation, elimination of the death penalty and the 'three strike law' for minors, gun safety laws, etc.). Honest repentance and true conversion will also lead us to the moral matter of reparations."
"Is economic power and privilege to follow Jesus. This young man is not a religious leader. He is simply an observant Jew, like Jesus himself, a goos religious practitioner. But there is just one thing: he is also wealthy and according to Jesus, must share his wealth to follow Jesus, something the man Immediately following this exchange, Jesus says to his disciples something that most of us learned in Sunday school when we were kids, passages that few of us want to talk about: 'Truly I tell you, it will be hard for a rich person to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God' (Matt. 19:23-24 NRSV).
"Now I learned in seminary that the image of the camel going through the eye of a needle may have referred to a particular geographic passage-the 'eye of a needle' being a gate in Jerusalem through which real camels had to pass, often with difficulty. This interpretation has been debated among Christians for centuries. Most Christian teachers' agree, however, that Jesus clearly expects his followers to share their wealth and possessions-and that he recognizes how unlikely it is that the very rich will do this."