My wife brought this book home for me having picked it up from the random variety of the sale trolley at the local library. I'm not sure if she was trying to say something. The title was not the most enticing: 'I Told Me So: Self-deception and the Christian life', but it had a foreword by Dallas Willard so it gained admittance to my reading list and I put it on my shelf where it sat for more than a couple of years.
Recently I was reading 'You Are What You Love' by James K A Smith and some things he said about our perception of ourselves made me think of this book. I thought about promoting it up the list, pulled it off the shelf and turned it over, only to find that the lead endorsement on the back was from James K A Smith himself. "In the tradition of Dallas Willard," Smith says amongst other things, "I Told Me So is a wonderful example of philosophy serving spiritual discipline." So it was decided - this uninviting little book would be my next read. Wondering if I was about to have my epistemological and maybe even my ontological world rocked, I took a depth breath, took a risk, and began.
The author, Gregg A Ten Elshof is Professor of Philosophy at Biola University (and, apropos of nothing, my Google search reveals him to be the wearer of an epic ponytail and goatee). In this book he harkens back to a time when awareness of self-deception was a common discussion point in philosophical discourse and spiritual formation (ie discipleship). He puts forward a very elegant argument for why talk of self-deception might have waned in an (existentialist) era that apparently values authenticity above all. In short: the current era, in highlighting authenticity, ups the stakes, causing us to back ourselves as authentic and leading us to avoid the risk of wondering about our own self-deception. (I think there might be a couple more factors too - differences in our era as opposed to past ones: a common awareness of the arbitrariness of knowing (softening the ground on which we judge), and second, an awareness of the complexity of knowing, in regard to the subconscious functions of the mind. Both these things, I think, make the idea of assessing our self-deception less straightforward. I digress.)
Elegance of argument is a feature of the book and the writing is very engaging. The content contradicts the forbidding air of the cover and title. Ten Elshof makes extensive use of story and humour to illustrate his points.
He starts off by talking about why we're so keen on self-deception and what it does for us - it's a completely understandable strategy. He then delves into how we think and believe and explores more deeply what self-deception is. In a humorous flip of the self-help mode, he goes on to tell us the best how-to methods for achieving high-functioning self-deception: attention management, procrastination, perspective switching, rationalisation and 'ressentiment'. Chapter 5 is called 'Getting Help When It's Not Working' and is about how to bolster self-deception by moving in certain circles, and the power of 'groupthink'.
From there, the rest of the book is about 'How Not To'. This starts by putting self-deception in its place, by demoting it (as per the argument about authenticity mentioned above). In other words, an exaggerated fear of self-deception prevents us from examining our self-deception (excellent general psychological principle there). He discusses how vulnerable we are to a full measure of truth - its potential to completely undo us (in the way that no one can look on the face of God and live) - and so highlights how the same mechanisms that are employed in self-deception are a gift from God to humanity to make our lives more manageable. He therefore invites 'a strange celebration' of self-deception.
Then the practical stuff - three suggestions for putting self-deception in its place and moving towards greater truth: 1. The old-fashioned idea of dying to self, and actively seeking an end to our deceptions and addictions; 2. Entering into diverse community - community that doesn't constantly parrot your own beliefs and preconceptions back to you; 3. Fostering communion with the Holy Spirit. He ends with three warnings: 'beware of hyper-authenticity', 'beware of undue suspicion of self-deception in others' and 'beware of undue self-doubt'.
Marvellous stuff, and all done in a kind and realistic but incisive and challenging way.
One thing the book doesn't do is benchmark or define truth and/or Truth, ie self-deception as opposed to what? That would be (and has been) more than several books in itself... So truth/Truth is taken as a given in the discussion.
An excellent book, so worth reading - unexpectedly enjoyable, thought-provoking and awareness-heightening.