bitcoin is the world
i think for the clueness
and some of the blockchain fanatics
on those financial radio shows
are total fruitcakes.....
Jeff Kaye's review on here is so well worded in places, i need to quote something
"the crypto 'industry' - if it can be called that - is based on the slim technology of blockchain (which is too slow to ever be useful) and the libertarian hype that fiat money is a government scam and needs to be replaced by decentralised money systems"
---
Amazone
covers all the bases and is very up-to-date
i went full circle regarding crypto. started in 2011 and thought it was great tech and relevant for everybody's future. after more than 10 years and literally no application for the average joe and his life i arrived at the conclusion it is in fact meaningless. this book was a very informative and surprisingly well written and researched work to find closure on my assumptions. a fool and his money are soon parted. buy this book, sell your crypto and be happy. great work guys.
Void
---
Excellent, Comprehensive, Interdisciplinary Critique
(with Horrendous Typos and Missing Phrases)
Stephen Diehl has written a comprehensive, multi-faceted polemic against the technology, political-economy and sociology of cryptocurrency. He makes use of a rare dual expertise in computer science and finance, as well as historical knowledge and a sophisticated political understanding, to dismantle the claims of cryptocurrency advocates across all domains.
He classifies cryptocurrencies as unregulated securities and exchanges as casinos, and situates the broader ecosystem in the historical-financial context of bubbles, speculative manias and scams; he explicates the crippling technical tradeoff inherent to blockchain technology (induced by a combination of absolute consensus and decentralisation); he dismantles the Austrian-school-influenced economic claims for cryptocurrencies; and more.
The critique is meticulous, technically rigorous, erudite, original, and devastating.
I wish I didn't have to make this criticism, but it must be said that I may have never read a book with more typos or, frankly, ungrammatical sentences. It genuinely seemed as if some sections of this book were first drafts that weren't even read over by the author. The reason I was able to mostly look over this is that most of the book didn't suffer from this flaw, only certain sections. An immediate bad sign when I first held the book was that the blurb on the back had random chunks of extra whitespace. Hopefully, these aspects are fixed up in future editions.
Tom