Having enjoyed the Joubert Chronicles and having been recommended Labyrinth many years ago, l finally started the Languedoc Trilogy with high hopes.
I ended up disappointed. Whilst the writing itself was initially pretty good as in the JC, there was too much of it, particularly in Citadel! Overall l felt the three books were overwritten; I could skim whole paragraphs and not lose the gist of the narrative. Most of my examples below relate to Citadel as it was (obviously) the last one l read, and my least favourite of the three, but the comments apply to all three books, though Citadel was by far the worst offender.
In my opinion there was too much (often unnecessary) detail - a description of pulling the trigger on a rifle was unnecessarily drawn out for example, and we didn’t need to know the make and model of a particular car that was a favourite of the Gestapo; there were whole paragraphs about various events which were fairly superficial (and this sometimes included conversation that wasn’t particularly engaging) which could have been dealt with in one sentence. There were huge tracts at the end of Citadel that could easily have been cut without affecting the story arc. I felt many explanations of (sometimes complex) events and histories were overblown - for example, the history of Tarot reading in Sepulchre which could have been much more concise. Most of this added little to the narrative but much to the length of each books.
I don’t like too many “teasings” in novels - oblique references to things that are clearly going to become obvious and/or significant later. While a captivating tactic in a mystery story, there were too many in this trilogy for me, especially as it’s a complex tale.
I was also irritated by the overuse of italicised French/German/Latin phrases. We get it! - Mosse speaks these languages fluently but there’s no need, for example, to randomly slip veille in when “old man” would have done perfectly. Ditto with citronelle. Up to a certain point it is a pleasing construct, but it became tedious after a while, given that so many examples were unnecessary. The Americanisms in Sepulchre were jarring too - Meredith had a cell, or she was “beat”.
The same comment applies to the overall weaving of facts into the story. Mosse quite clearly has a stupendous knowledge but not all of it was necessary, nor added anything to the telling; it sometimes felt like showing off to be honest.
As for the three major love interests - no thanks. I felt the sexual episodes were jarring and the immediate attraction between Sandrine and Raoul/Meredith and Hal/ Alice and Will clichéd.
I read the first two books quite quickly, and mostly enjoyed them even with the niggles, but l really struggled with Citadel, especially towards the end - the climax of which was fanciful at best. About three quarters of the way through l couldn’t wait to finish reading it - l’d lost impetus and interest. By this point it was a trial rather than a pleasure.
I had been looking forward to reading this trilogy and although l really wanted to like it, l didn’t. This area and its history is clearly a passion of Mosse, and the books a labour of love, so l feel bad about being so critical. To balance it out though, l liked the interweaving of the plot(s), the quality of some of the earlier writing (my comments above notwithstanding) and was impressed by the obvious research that has gone into this book.
Overall, three stars.