This book reminds me of how pretentious academia can be sometimes.
I really enjoyed the first three essays and the concluding one. The ones in-between (the contributions) were not for me.
They were mainly critiques of previous studies, and that's not what I need at the moment.
Add to that the unnecessary complexity and wordiness, it really put me off at times.
I'd say the chapters mentioned above are definitely worth the read, and if you are interested in the trickster archetype, do give them a chance.