If you are, as I am, a hardcore Dahlia Lithwick fan, you heard a lot about this book before it was released, including her frequent quotation of the male lawyer who asked her why she wanted to write "a little pink book about the law," which is why she advocated for the pink cover.
This little pink book about the law is, in fact, a full-throated argument for the role of women in the last century through now (mostly now) in both defending and changing the law, in revering it and disdaining it, and in remaining committed to ensuring that the law does the best it can, especially when the law and the common good are under threat.
Lithwick does this by profiling a list of women lawyers, starting with the redoubtable and still under-acknowledged Pauli Murray. Murray, in case you don't know about her, was one of the nation's first Black female lawyers (though "female" is complicated; Murray always identified as some part male, and would probably now be called transgender or gender-fluid, and might well use they/them pronouns). Murray's accomplishments are legion, but two that need to be called out are that the 1964 Supreme Court "borrowed" (without either permission or acknowledgment) one of her law-school papers as a foundational piece of the decision in Brown vs. Board of Education, and that she mentored Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She is the brightest star in my personal category "Black women whose names should be household words."
After Murray, Lithwick goes to Sally Yates, who stood up for the law at the Department of Justice until Donald Trump fired her for not supporting the first Muslim flight ban. She goes to Becca Heller, indefatigable immigration rights activist, who was the central motivator for the "lawyers at airports" response to that ban. Heller is notably quote'd as saying that she got a law degree because she was in a circle of activists, each one of whom "would've cut out their left eye' to help, say, the mother of a wrongly incarcerated son, 'and we were all, What can we do?'" But nobody was a lawyer, so she realized, "Ugh, I guess I've got to go to law school."
Other chapters cover Roberta Kaplan, who won a victory for the victims of Charlottesville's Unite the Right rally (and is now all over the news for representing E. Jean Carroll), Anita Hill (and by extension Christine Blasey Ford) Stacey Abrams, and several others. Each chapter goes both into the personalities being profiled and the legal questions being examined, all through the lens of what women tend to do differently than men, both in the law and in our lives.
Lithwick is very open about her own fears and disgust of the historical moment, and she goes into not just her inability to enter the Supreme Court (where she was an assigned reporter) after Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation, but her visceral reaction to that period -- and her husband's and sons' support and understanding. And yet, as we all need in books like this, she offers up several flavors of hope--some of it in the indomitable personalities she is showing us, some of it in the victories, and much of it in the underlying insights she offers into how laws, and historical moments, can be changed.