Gandhi is usually dismissed as an anti-modernist, a luddite and a prophet of the pre-industrial age. Jerry Rao tries to dispel these easy assumptions. Gandhi, Rao argues, was not against the market or the creation of wealth. Rather, he took great joy in the success of Indian businessmen and industrialists. He hobnobbed with them and made them give their wealth to his causes. He was however not a votary of wealth for wealth sake. He saw wealth as a means, not an end in itself. He therefore proposed the doctrine of trusteeship; the wealthy should hold wealth in a fiduciary capacity for the good of the society. It follows that the state has no right to expropriate wealth. Wealth rightfully belongs to the wealth creators. Rao sees the roots of Gandhis economic ideas in Hindu texts like, Bhagwat Gita (nishkama karma), Isavasya Upanishad (isavasya midam Sarva..), the Gospels, traditions of Christian groups like Quakers and Trappist monks and English common law concept of equity. According to Rao, Gandhi did not belong to the ‘shramanic’ traditions of Hinduism, rather he was a “worldly ascetic” much like Weber’s Protestants. Gandhi admired physical labour and the tradition of tinkering as a way of advancing knowledge, spurring innovation and enterprise. He incorporated tinkering into his theory of education, 'Nai Talim'.
Rao's book reminds us of an aspect of Gandhi's life and philosophy that is often ignored.