Writing a review of this book I find it its necessary to distinguish the writing style from the content.
The content and subject matter
I can’t imagine there is a reader out there who is not going to respond strongly to the clear injustice meted out to so many vulnerable girls over so many years in Irish convents. This is one such story. Irish convents (predominantly, but not exclusively) have received recent, and necessary, publicity leading to the publication of the McAleese Report in 2013. A formal state apology followed. Even now though, many questions remain about culpability in the Magdalene laundries, and accusations of cover up continue.
I recently read the much acclaimed, and more widely known 2021 novel Small Things Like These by Claire Keegan. This is very good, and is one of a number of heartfelt books written on the subject. BBC news reporter (and Russia expert) Martin Sixsmith wrote The Lost Child of Philomena Lee This was filmed and Oscar nominated, generating considerable publicity for a subject . In 2015 he made a BBC television documentary, Ireland's Lost Babies, in which he revisited Philomena's story by travelling to the United States to investigate the Irish Catholic Church’s role in an adoption trade which saw thousands of children taken from their mothers and sent abroad
There have been a number of other writers on the subject (fiction and non-fiction) who have personal connections to the demonstrably abusive regimes run by the convent, and there is so much real life material available (through records and oral history) since the convents taking in pregnant girls were functioning from 1922 (the first convent in Dublin) through to 1996.
In this context I thought that Freud’s imagining of the experiences of her lead female, Rosaleen was very well done.
Freud sets her story at The Sacred Heart convent in Bessborough, Co Cork (opened in 1922); one of the most infamous of the twentieth century laundry/convents.
The Writing Style
There are not a few reviews (in the newspapers and on Goodreads), that point out that the structure of the book is challenging. Freud has thrown three elements into the mix in the structure of the book. It is non-linear; it alternates between three different female points of view (across three generations), and each character takes off in a stream of consciousness, often mid paragraph.
I think this works. A straight account of the subject matter (as above) is useful for the reader to build some background knowledge, but I Couldn’t Love You More is unsettling as it takes the reader to places where so much is hidden and unknown, and it gave me some sense of the lack of information that the leading characters experienced.
The nuns in the story are the foremost villains. “Sisterhood” is understood today as a term of mutual support between women; but not so in this context in which love for fellow females is in short supply, to be replaced by condemnation, and where misfortune is described as wickedness.
In the outer world, the men depicted in Freud’s novel are found wanting. They are short on empathy; they don’t know the meaning of forgiveness, they are morally and sexually promiscuous without any regard for the women and girls they chase and grope. Matt and Felix are contemptible, Cashel is cold hearted.
One small non-consequential detail intrigued me (not central to the story whatsoever) when Freud made a point of something that I assumed was in no need of explanation.
Cash (Aoife’s husband) is described by Freud as he was getting dressed
He “slid a shirt from its hanger and buttoned it methodically, starting as he always did, at the top” (256)
Don’t you always button a shirt from the top downwards? To my surprise there is a gender divide here. The women I have checked with tell me that many buttoned shirts need to start from the bottom up (double linings; dual buttons…). I have yet to speak to a man who has ever buttoned a shirt from the bottom upwards!!
Esther Freud and Claire Keegan’s novels will stay with me. I plan to read The Country Girls (1960) by Edna O’Brien, a novel about the love lives of two young women, banned by the Irish censor, publicly burned and dismissed as “filth”. This book is referred to by Aoife when she tidies Rosaleen’s bedroom.
I heard Esther Freud speak at The Trinity Theatre, Tunbridge Wells on 18.05.2022
• (initially hidden) significance of book title (double entendre)
• Kate the hardest character to write. Only when adopted the mindset of being an orphan. Just thinking it. Don’t have to put it in.
• Book about generational contrasts (Kate Atkinson Life after life the inspiration).
• June Goulding book. 1930’s Cork midwife.
• Birth scenes at convent were written at the British Library
• Old days. Man for life, children come and go. Today, Now reversed
• Hypocrisy of nuns. Wicked girls…. Bring us more; for the business, for release fee, to sell the babies.