warning, very rambly review/collection of thoughts
narrated by a 21 year old korean and chinese student at columbia, WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON follows reed's first trip back home to LA since becoming an activist in new york. he debuts a new self to his family and friends, one who is fluent in political theory and has seemingly perfect, pristine politics. he is eager to learn about his parent's past involvement in communism and black-korean community building, but is consistently frustrated with what they tell him and what he perceives as the hypocrisy and contradictory lifestyles of everyone around him.
this was a book i was so excited for, but when it first came out, i read multiple critical reviews. most of these reviews came from black readers who wrote about their discontent with the way the novel uses the murder of akai gurley as a backdrop for the novel, and the absence of black characters in a novel to which afro-asian solidarity feels so crucial. others told me that the narrator was absolutely insufferable. i decided, then, that i probably wouldn't read the novel. anyway, i obviously did, and i clearly liked it. if i address all of these things this review will get too long, but i will say i understand the critique re: backdrop and i feel like it is complicated. i go back and forth. the story is not *about* black lives matter and it's ultimately not a story about solidarity either. the heart of the story is reed's relationship with his mother and the crucial lesson she attempts to impart upon him is the importance of one's lived reality. rather than the performance of perfect politics and allyship, his mother guides him to focus on what is in front of him. anyway, already sensing this getting too long so moving on.
reed is an insufferable narrator, a young and over eager Man™ who is all too ready to "educate" someone (mostly his korean mother, an accomplished organizer) and tell them why they're complicit in oppression. what was absent from the reviews i read was that reed's insufferability is in many ways the point AND, more importantly, that the novel doesn't let him off the hook for being a dick. he is constantly slapped around by literally everyone around him, who see how ridiculous he is being and it is this dynamic that makes the novel readable imo. the novel itself is about all the growing reed needs to do--to realize that we all live in a space of contradiction, that movement building and organizing is not about analysis and abstract principles, but about the slow and unglamorous work of relationship building. even though the novel is narrated by reed, i could often feel distance between reed himself and his voice as narrator and i think that also helps with the readability.
i get why people don't like this novel and can't finish it. reed consistently being a dick to his loving parents and his friends is certainly annoying, and it's sometimes just very painful. it's cringe to admit, but i responded to this novel as strongly as i did because reed felt resonant to me and my own distant past of being 21 and entering into organizing from an academic space. i was never the asshole reed was (though maybe that's not for me to say, clown emoji), but that's because of gender and reed is definitely, as i said above, a Man™, one who always feels entitled to speak and to be heard. one of the main things that stood out to me in the novel was the gender imbalance of reed's personal growth all being facilitated by the women around him--his mother, his friend CJ, his fellow organizer tiff. he is the recipient of so much care and gendered labor. where are the dudes in his life to come collect him? anyway, feeling this over and over made me crave a story about intergenerational organizing between women and how different that story would be. i will say though that the women in the novel for the most part do feel fleshed out and realized, especially his mother who goes through her own smaller growing process.
i feel like we are in a cultural moment where we receive a lot of bad takes and awful representations of political organizing. reed at his worst plays right into that, embodying the stereotypical asshole that no one can stand. but i think this novel goes a step beyond all of those other stories in the way that it commits itself to nuancing that. again, i don't think this novel was trying to do anything as ambitious as maybe a lot of people thought (myself included). it is no treatise on afro-asian solidarity, nor does it offer any new and stunning analysis of race in america. but it does narrativize the first and maybe one of the most important lessons of organizing: if we want to change the world, we must first change ourselves and our world. it begins from wherever you are.
anyway, i loved this novel. once you get past how deeply annoying reed is (if you can), the rest of the novel moves with a good pace and is engaging--for me, a page turner. it depicts a version of LA i know, mainly ktown, and it brought out a fondness for my own times there. reed's growth is somewhat slow going, and there are a lot of emotional highs and lows. it hit really hard at some points with both pain but also wow, chicken skin moments. the endings of the last two chapters made me feel something. the novel offers a lot of wisdom through the supporting characters, lessons i think i needed to hear right now. for me, it's a novel about patience and generosity, about how to live life and be in relation with ourself and others.